What I’m saying is that for solar punk to be a credible socialist aesthetic it would need to EXPAND to include depcitions of labour. Let me know if this is still confusing for you.
What I’m saying is that for solar punk to be a credible socialist aesthetic it would need to EXPAND to include depcitions of labour. Let me know if this is still confusing for you.
This is moving the goalposts, but it’s a pretty valid place to leave the goalposts. There is no centralized accreditor of solarpunk; it’s still more of a pidgin than a fully-developed language. But you can still point to what is internally coherent and distinct, and what is not.
Nowhere did I say that, but I guess using straw man is what you’re going to go with here. Clearly not much point trying to continue having this discussion.
you said “people standing around enjoying environments that somebody built is not what depiction of labour looks like” in response to solar-punk art of people doing farm labour
are you looking for labour or construction work here
I’m looking for a depiction of how the society is actually functions. Solar-punk aesthetic is but a small sliver of that.
so you’re not looking for depictions of labour in solar-punk?
What I’m saying is that for solar punk to be a credible socialist aesthetic it would need to EXPAND to include depcitions of labour. Let me know if this is still confusing for you.
This is moving the goalposts, but it’s a pretty valid place to leave the goalposts. There is no centralized accreditor of solarpunk; it’s still more of a pidgin than a fully-developed language. But you can still point to what is internally coherent and distinct, and what is not.
I’m not moving any goal posts. This has been what I’ve consistently said throughout this thread.
Okay, I agree, why, you even put it in the title.
There was no struggle session on July 14, 2025. It never happened.
I stand by what I put in the title, and it in no way contradicts anything I said in this thread.
so you don’t consider farm labour and public transportation labour to be labour?
Nowhere did I say that, but I guess using straw man is what you’re going to go with here. Clearly not much point trying to continue having this discussion.
you said “people standing around enjoying environments that somebody built is not what depiction of labour looks like” in response to solar-punk art of people doing farm labour
How to say you’ve never set foot on a farm without saying it.
so it’s a flawed depiction of farm labour?