• infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What I’m saying is that for solar punk to be a credible socialist aesthetic it would need to EXPAND to include depcitions of labour. Let me know if this is still confusing for you.

    This is moving the goalposts, but it’s a pretty valid place to leave the goalposts. There is no centralized accreditor of solarpunk; it’s still more of a pidgin than a fully-developed language. But you can still point to what is internally coherent and distinct, and what is not.