Previously the reporting on this did not have a political angle and so it was removed from Politics and correctly directed to News.

The charges related to terrorism now give this a political angle.

“Luigi Mangione is accused of first-degree murder, in furtherance of terrorism; second-degree murder, one count of which is charged as killing as an act of terrorism; criminal possession of a weapon and other crimes.”

The terrorism statutes can be found here:

https://criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com/ny-penal-law-490-25-crime-of-terrorism.html

“The act must be committed with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.”

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Terrorism to bring this to first-degree is very much a stretch in my eyes. The poor civilian CEO population are spooked by one person getting shot.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The second part of the statue, to cause government action, does seem kind of appropriate. But I highly doubt he thought he could pull that off and it’s going to take a lot more 2nd player characters to get there.

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        22 hours ago

        They aren’t dropping the second degree murder charge, so they don’t necessarily have to meet the higher bar that this sets.

        That said, while they probably want to be able to paint him as a terrorist, that necessarily involves a more detailed look at what he was trying to accomplish, and that might just backfire on the prosecution. It only takes one sympathetic juror to block a guilty verdict.

        • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That said, while they probably want to be able to paint him as a terrorist, that necessarily involves a more detailed look at what he was trying to accomplish, and that might just backfire on the prosecution. It only takes one sympathetic juror to block a guilty verdict.

          This is a really good insight, thanks!