“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, by reminding them that “hey we are the party that stops you from actively being deported and barred from entering the country.”

    When Democrats had control of both houses and the presidency, what legislation did they introduce to stop Muslims from being deported and barred from entry into the country? What did they put into place to keep the next bigoted turd from implementing a Muslim ban?

    Oh, and they’re funding a genocide?

    • boywar3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NO_BAN_Act

      They did this…it passed in the house and has been stuck in committees for ages

      As for funding genocide…yeah the Democratic party has a problem in that most voters lean towards Palestine and the party doesn’t, but its also a relatively “new” issue in the eyes of the public (most people didn’t think about Israel or Palestine before this for any amount of time), so who knows? Maybe things shift as things go on

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They did this…it passed in the house and has been stuck in committees for ages

        Looks like it was introduced by Democrats during the Trump administration and then reintroduced and silently killed during the Biden administration. In fairness, it was in fact introduced. I’ll give them credit for that.

        As for funding genocide…yeah the Democratic party has a problem in that most voters lean towards Palestine and the party doesn’t

        Wouldn’t be the first time that the party acted contrary to the will of their voters and then demanded support anyway. But genocide is the issue this time. That’s an extremely bitter pill to swallow, and it’s disturbing to discover how many in your own party love the taste.

        Maybe things shift as things go on

        Democrats don’t shift left.

        • boywar3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It all rolls back to the same problem in the end:

          The dems don’t need to care until the Republicans stop being utter garbage, or enough of the population forces them to reconsider at once. We are. ot there yet so the best course of action is to aid the party that won’t take away your rights to vote.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The dems don’t need to care until the Republicans stop being utter garbage

            You forgot to add “lol”