• Lasherz@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I feel like the approval process at these federal institutes used to be about 7 people long and now the approval process is 1 nazi giggling with 2 other nazis and then some normal military person parallel to them continually has to clean up the mess.

    • criss_cross@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I just assumed it was Pete Hegseth after a bender going “Swastikas for all!!!” And some poor intern figuring out how to make his boss not fire him.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t believe there’s an after to his benders. The day he wakes up sober asking what he did is the day he wakes up in an ominously heated cave.

  • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    🫩 They’re never going to stop. Test boundaries of decency, wait for backlash. If backlash presents, reverse and repeat later.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Wow they managed to do the right thing by not doing anything at all.

    That really ought to be a sign for them but as we know they’re just not very smart.

    Dig UP, stupid!

  • snooggums@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Divisive or hate symbols and flags are prohibited,” the latest Coast Guard policy, released late Thursday, declared before adding that this category included “a noose, a swastika, and any symbols or flags co-opted or adopted by hate-based groups.”

    I’m trying to wrap my head around nooses being ‘coopted by hate groups’ as when used as a legal punishment their only use as a symbol served the same purpose. Still, rolling back far enough to add ‘hate’ back to the policy is better than just divisive.