For my birthday, my spouse got me a nicer newer expensive version of a thing I already have. The one I have is older and dented but works just fine. I use it weekly. I never complain about it. I’ve never asked for a newer one. The one I have was given to me by my mother in law, whom I adore. It’s sentimental.

I don’t like new things. When they got me a 3d printer, it was the cheapest one and it was a kit and I had to build myself. I loved it. It’s perfect for me. I regularly buy things used or get things from Buy Nothing groups. I much prefer to repair old things in many ways. My car has over 100k miles. The one before did too. I don’t like new things.

We got into a huge argument because I want to return it. They are so upset with me that they left the house to calm down. Why am I the bad person? Why are they mad at me? I have a very clear tendency for old broken used things. Why am I obligated to like this new thing?

We literally established a rule early in our marriage. I’m not allowed to gift nerdy t shirts. They don’t like them. I love them. I thought they would like them but they do not. So they asked me to stop. This feels the same. I do not like new things. Why am I the bad guy for wanting to return the newer version of the thing I already have?

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You may be autistic and should get properly diagnosed. I am not joking. Your spouse was trying to do a nice thing for you and maybe even liked the idea of you using something they got you all the time the way you use your current one. Given how you form emotional attachments to old and familiar things and given how you don’t understand your spouse’s hurt, you are very likely on spectrum. Being diagnosed will help give you the tools to better interact with others, and will help those close to you — like your spouse — know how to relate to you more effectively.

    • Leather@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Unnecessary, uncool. Why try to label someone why you don’t know, and obviously don’t have the credentials to diagnose?

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Because this isn’t a regular behavior. Ignoring a potential abnormality will just complicate their life. They didn’t diagnose anyone, please learn to read.

      • Oascany@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I mean they did say “you may be…” and then followed it up with advice to talk to a professional. I don’t think there was an attempt to diagnose here, even though I don’t agree with how the comment was worded. Personally, I think everyone should get tested to see what neuroatypicalities they have.

  • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I understand why both of you might be upset but they will eventually understand why it wasn’t the best gift idea for you and all will be fine. Those things happen, don’t interpret so much into it. It might not be as obvious to them as you think it should be that you don’t like new things. Talk about it in a respectful way, they wanted to do something nice for you after all.

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I had issues with this, with my partner. They love surprises, and kept trying to learn how to correctly surprise me with a gift.

    The sentence that finally got us on the same page:

    “I can enjoy a surprise. But I enjoy same event, whatever it is, more, if it is not a surprise. I don’t necessarily hate every event that is a surprise. But every surprise is less pleasant to me than the same event would be without the surprise.”

    This finally got them to stop trying to find a right way to surprise me, and just make a judgement call whether the surprise was worth making it a little less nice for me.

    They do still surprise me, sometimes, but they finally understand that there’s a cost, to me, to it. And now they weigh that into their decision, and it is so nice for me!

    Edit: And we now have a shared understanding that anything big or expensive or hard to store needs to not be a surprise.

  • Slayan@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s time for new rules OP, and also a good talk with your S.O. nothing you did is wrong and nothing they did is wrong. It’s more about being open and having discussions. They should know these kind of things, and the fact that they don’t is both your fault.

    No one is suffering here (imo) so that’s a great success.

  • Natanael@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    You have to explain why in a much clearer way.

    Explain that you do appreciate it. Explain that if you hadn’t had the prior thing you probably would have loved it. But now, it’s a change, and it’s a big change, in several ways, including the nostalgia factor, and you absolutely appreciate that this thing is newer and more expensive but it doesn’t YET make sense for you to make the change and because of that you don’t want to make the change.

    And because of that, it will just be sitting unused and you don’t like the idea of it sitting unused.

    It felt bad to you to not use a gift.

    And that, wanting to keep what you have, not wanting a change, and not wanting it to sit unused, is why you suggested a return, and not because you don’t appreciate it.

    I think you’ll have to explain the “not wanting change” bit the most, by explaining why you feel that way. Maybe try finding a similar comparison. Imagine you’d gift them expensive jewelry or clothes they feel they couldn’t ever wear, maybe something they couldn’t wear together with their favorite clothing. A bag that would only sit in a closet. A tool that does more, but is heavier or whatever. Whatever that feels relevant to them, that makes them understand why you feel like you don’t want to make the change, not yet.

    this is brilliant, but I like this

    How should you have initially responded? Hard to say without knowing the people around you, but I’d say it would’ve been safe to say something like “oh, I don’t know if I can replace the current thing yet, I like it too much, and it’s got so many years left”

    In other words, tell her that the gift was indeed great and that there’s wrong with the gift except timing, and emphasize you do not fault her for anything, you’re happy she thought of it, you’re sorry your reaction made her feel bad, you should’ve communicated better, and you’ll make a change to communicate better.

    Perhaps even say something like “I probably should’ve told you I wanted to use this current thing for much longer, I should’ve explained more about how I think about these things and how I plan”. Because your initial response sucked honestly, and you need to make sure your phrasing don’t make her feel she made a mistake.

    If she really likes being able to give you gifts, and if she now feels uncertain about being able to give you future gifts (this is very likely, by the way!), you should consider implementing that “communicating better” thing - for example (you don’t need to do it exactly like this, IT’S AN EXAMPLE) by maintaining and sharing a list of your existing things plus a wishlist, with details like “don’t replace before” and “replace no later than” and “required specs: XYZ”. And if she likes feeling like she can put her own touch on it, DO NOT present it as “do exactly this”, but rather “you can take inspiration from this”.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Gifts don’t have to be something you like, want, or need. It’s about the thought, care, and love that goes into them. Whether you like new things or old things, it doesn’t matter. Gifts have subtext. Your SO probably will equate your love for the gift with your love for them. Use them both. Love them both. Love the people who gave you both.

  • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It seems to me it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to shop for someone that refuses any “new” item.

    Also, how many nerdy t-shirts did you gift them before the rule was in place? How did your partner react to all of those t-shirts? Did they immediately demand you return them?

    It is a harsh reaction to request a gift just be returned.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      It’s also pretty shitty to be told that thing you love sucks take this version they think is better and you HAVE to like it

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s a pretty extreme interpretation of being given a gift…

        You aren’t even OP… Are you OK?

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          It’s not just any person giving a gift or the giving of a random gift. This is specific to this particular gift, in this particular scenario, to this particular person who explained thoroughly why this was not a good gift to give at all. I’m giving OP benefit if the doubt that their recommendation was doing and should have been understood by their spouse without judgment. As presented, it could easily be misrepresented, but I’m taking it as is for objectivity

          A hyperbole (pronounced “hy-per-buh-lee”) is a literary device that uses extreme exaggeration to create strong emphasis

          I’m fine, perhaps I went a little too overboard, but it was intending hyperbole to make clear the point I was arguing from, which was that the spouse hurt OP and is being made it as a villain for it

          Perhaps I misunderstood this literary device or how to use it, but now you know what I was attempting, I’ll consider an edit if you want to play Editor for a minute

  • Aneb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Down vote me if ya want but I very much feel OP. I always will take an older model or refurnished over some new, overly priced gizmo. I understand that the new thing is maybe an improvement but the capitalist churn of new devices every other week makes me sick. “What’s wrong with older devices?”, is my shtick. A computer from 2011 will run fine without a copious amount of bloat publishers push. I had a very thoughtful mother in law who fixed my screen on my computer instead of buying me a new laptop. My ex husband on the other hand always wanted the trendiest item Instagram was selling and would request his mom get it for him, we were poor (who would’ve guess two kids in their 20s were working on our finances). I’m still actively playing my original Xbox One from 16ish years ago, and my console still loads faster than my friends’ newer consoles.

  • Pazintach@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    This sounds like me… Father gave me a gift that I don’t need, I get irritated and said something that I shouldn’t say. Spouse pointed that out to me, said it was their thought that mattered. I feel sorry and guilty ever since…

    I never used that thing, but I kept it very safe.

    • StuffYouFear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Eh I’m the same as OP about old stuff. I’ll hold to old stuff even if it is the wrose possible option due to sentimental value.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Remember, gifting is a shared experience, meant to be appreciated by the giftee as well as the gifter. It’s obvious that your partner put thought into the gift, and that should be appreciated. Giving thoughtful gifts is not an easy task. Just because you have a new item does not diminish the value of the old sentimental one. But demanding the new one be returned could easily sow resentment in your relationship that will be revisited every gifting season.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I… Sort of agree and sort of disagree. They thought of OP, but also… Didn’t. OP is being stubborn in understanding, but so is the gift giver. It’s a sensitive and complex situation, and both parties’ emotions are valid and just a little bit selfish.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      they didn’t put any good damned thought into it. Not any that wasn’t completely selfish.

  • Mesophar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    We literally established a rule early in our marriage. I’m not allowed to gift nerdy t shirts. They don’t like them. I love them. I thought they would like them but they do not. So they asked me to stop. This feels the same.

    This point stood out to me. I’m assuming that you verbally established a “no nerdy t-shirts” rule, but did not verbally establish the “no new items” rule. If it was only implied, or you felt it was obvious to not buy you new gifts, but did not explicitly establish that rule like you did for the t-shirts, then it is not the same. Neither of you are bad or wrong for the moscommunication, but this is a great opportunity to have an open and frank discussion about gift expectations for each other.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Why should they get to be upset about it because it’s a gift, yet the item being replaced with not something similar in style but different, but a literally new version of beloved gift, is supposed to be discarded without any thought about that gift.

      Like what the hell is that logic. That gift you love and use all the time without ever mentioning a problem with is not good enough for my liking, replace it with MY version of it or you will hurt my feelings and that majes YOU a bad person for my feelings getting hurt.

      Sorry but f that logic say I’m sorry I didnt know it meant so much to you.

      They should be made to answer, in front of the mother in law, why and how the perfectly loved and valued watch needed to be replaced

      • Mesophar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Do you care about the person that gave the gift? Do you trust and believe that they love you and got the gift in good faith, trying to do well even if it was flawed? Then express gratitude for the intention, even if you don’t want the gift. “Sorry, I’m happy with the one I have and don’t want to replace it.”

        Do you care about the person you want to give a gift to? Do you trust and believe that they love you and them disliking a gift isn’t an indicator that they dislike you? Then humbly accept that your gift wasn’t the right one, and work together with them to find something they would prefer instead.

        It isn’t difficult if you just talk with each other. Sometimes people pick bad gifts. Sometimes people are sentimentally attached to items. Sometimes people are very practical and have a “if it isn’t broken, it doesn’t need to be replaced/fixed” mentality that supercedes other considerations. Me, I have the opposite extreme. Even if a gift I receive is nothing something I have any intention of using, I feel obligated to find a space and use for it as a show of appreciation to the person that gifted it to me, because I wasnt owed the gift in the first place and I have gratitude they were thinking of me. That can be (is) unhealthy in an entirely different way.

        But even if you think a gift is dumb and wrong and it’s an insult that they even gave it to you, if you love that person you swallow that pride and let them know you appreciate what they were trying to do but that they got it wrong this time. This can be done gently instead of coldly. And I am not saying OP had done it coldly, maybe the gift giving partner has insecurities they need to deal with. I don’t know, I wasn’t there. Understanding why the gift giving partner would be upset that their gift was snubbed only takes a hint of empathy to understand, though. On the other hand, it’s also easy to understand why the receiver would be confused why the gift was chosen in the first place, with the information provided. Both are missreading each other on different points.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Do you care about the person that gave the gift? Do you trust and believe that they love you and got the gift in good faith, trying to do well even if it was flawed? Then express gratitude for the intention, even if you don’t want the gift. “Sorry, I’m happy with the one I have and don’t want to replace it.”

          Yes that’s why there is a problem with the reaction wanting to return the gift. Maybe we didn’t understand the same thing.

          The giver was hurt because the reciever expressed that they didn’t want the gift so they should return it because it won’t get used. “Sorry, I’m happy with the one I have and don’t want to replace it.” There is no indication that how you phrased this isn’t exactly what op did. Unlikely, but we don’t know any more than after expressing they don’t want a new version that they suggested it be returned. To me that says I’m sorry but this was a waste and I don’t want your effort to be wasted.

          If this was an acquaintance and not their partner I could see it differently, maybe. I’m trying not to make assumptions about anything here and using the post on its own merit. So as far as I’m concerned OP didn’t do anything wrong and is confused by the hurt reaction. Coming here to try and get an outside perspective is an attempt to get a less biased perspective on the situation which is evidence that OP actually cares a great deal about why this is a problem and is literally asking us to help understand.

          A lot of the comments have made wild assumptions about OP “scolding” their spouse when that’s not information we know and it is being assumed.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Are you neurodivergent? If, then it seems like a clear and typical misunderstanding of expectations.

    If not, consider if you might be 😉

      • Sprinks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So…i hate to add to it…but my husband is mildly autistic and we’ve had this exact conflict with gift giving early in our marriage.

        He sees the act of gift giving very logically and practically, which is perfectly fine, but i didnt really understand this early on in our relationship. We eventually sat down, talked about how we each felt, and it clicked that we had a disconnect on the social/emotional layer of gift giving. I saw and felt that gift giving was more of an act of showing the other person they crossed your mind; a display of emotion. On the other hand, my husband saw and felt gift giving was more about making sure the item is exactly what the other person wants, including if that item is “nothing”; logical, literal, and practical.

        Sit down together and talk. Use “I” statements, keep calm voices, and dont interrupt. The goal is to express how you feel, listen to how they feel, and work together to help each other understand both perspectives.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        They can go fuck themselves if they aren’t going to explain that. Being autistic isn’t a god damned reason for you to be insulted.

        You might be autistic and don’t know it. Any of us might be.

        That person is a piece of shit for treating autism like it’s a slur. And also shitting all over your clear attempt to try to understand this situation.

        I would be pissed if someone did that to me and then makes me out to be some villain because they fucked up on their gift.

        • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I didn’t say it as a slur. The fact that you took it that way says more about you than me. The situation described is textbook autistic behavior.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You didn’t explain it or provide any additional context. You used it exactly as it has been used, word for word, as is used when it’s being used as a slur.

            I was clear to say without an explanation it is a slur.