• toynbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s anecdotal, but back when I was on Reddit, I saw someone say that a prospective employer actually required your full credentials so that they could check your private information as well.

    • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      i recently looked up the Security clearance law in my country, which has 3 levels.

      And only in the highest level, for social media, all they do is look at your public profile (if i did not misread it) (They do stuff like asking people close to you questions tho)

      • Wolf314159@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That makes sense, because any government agencies that actually have a need for intimate knowledge of your social media footprint don’t actually need your password to harvest ALL the data that network has on you public and private.

        • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I mean not really. In my country atleast, any goverment agency would require an order from an judge, which essential means that someone is part of active investigation/ suspect of a crime

          spy agencys might have different capabilties, but practices like this would still be most likely illegal, without a cause

          • Wolf314159@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            There’s no need to involve the courts when the social media networks are complicit. It’s not as if “how” they obtained the data will ever be tested in court, they only need the data for their own internal investigations. Courts and spy agencies don’t have anything to do with it.

            • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 minutes ago

              that is just not true. Social media networks are also required by law to keep this data safe and not hand it out just because anyone asks. This is illegal and not how it works at all.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That not only sounds illegal and shady, it would be the dumbest thing you could do.

      Now somebody else has your account, uploads some Epstein material for shits and giggles and you can go to jail

      That is an immediate “Nope the fuck out of there, you do NOT want to work in het place”