yes-honey-left

  • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    oh hey, she criticizes the old democrat door knocking campaigns, and prescribes one that looks a lot more like what the DSA has done with the New York Mamdani campaign

    • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      ooh interesting question:

      Stuart: are the reforms that Democrats are talking about not enough? Are they basically tinkering at the edges of a system that is inherently corrupt and not delivering, as opposed to rethinking that system so that it delivers more directly? Lets talk about the ACA. Basically, it’s a conservative fix to a healthcare system that is an outlier in the civilized world. It gives people a coupon that allows them, maybe, entrance into this circus that is our healthcare system. So now Democrats are fighting to keep the cost of that coupon slightly less. Are you now trapped in a program that ultimately wasn’t the fix that we wanted it to be, to a system that inherently won’t function well because of externalities in a straight, capitalist, supply-and-demand way?

      Harris: We still have work to do to make America’s health system deliver for all the people, and not be a function of how much money you have in your back pocket. And Democrats do come from that place, of believing healthcare should be a right, and not just a privilege of those that can afford it. So how do you get there? Well, part of how you get there immediately on this issue of where we are with the shutdown is to hold firm, as they are doing. Part of it has to be to continue to reform the system. The Affordable Care Act was a significant reform for its time. But there is more work to be done, which includes, for example, the affordability of prescription medication. We pushed for a $35 cap on insulin, which had a huge impact on so many people. We did it for seniors. We wanted to do it for everyone. We couldn’t get the support of Republicans in Congress.

      Stuart: But again, it speaks to incremental change.

      Harris: Which is never satisfying

      lol, it’s the response quoted in the twitter screenshot except it leaves out the last sentence;

      And it’s not where we should be. And it should not satisfy us, that we have accomplished incremental change. We should be completely pissed off about that.

      • SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Appreciate the context.

        And it’s not where we should be. And it should not satisfy us, that we have accomplished incremental change. We should be completely pissed off about that.

        People are pissed off about it. It’s why they’re electing fascists and socialism is more popular than ever before despite the establishment demonizing the word for the last 100 years.