• LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 天前

    Passing a law that is explicitly unconstitutional to end a labour dispute is pretty next level. Saying that this is a threat to democracy overall is not hyperbole. If governments think they have that kind of power with that low a bar, we are all in trouble.

    • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 天前

      According to the Alberta Institute, it isn’t unconstitutional because:

      the “notwithstanding clause” is Section 33 of The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which itself makes up part of our Constitution.

      It is a cornerstone of Canada’s constitutional framework, designed to protect the provinces and all Canadians from judicial overreach.

      “Parliament or the legislature of a province may expressly declare in an Act of Parliament or of the legislature, as the case may be, that the Act or a provision thereof shall operate notwithstanding a provision included in section 2 or sections 7 to 15 of this Charter.”

      And provinces would not have signed the Constitution without that clause.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 天前

        The particular of the constitution that says you don’t have to follow the constitution is certainly part of the constitution. I wouldn’t say it makes using it constitutional, bit it certainly makes it clear that you don’t intend to follow the constitution. I honestly can’t think of many valid reasons to use the notwithstanding clause that aren’t to address existential threats to our nation or its people, or to trample their constitutiinal rights. I don’t think kids having to stay home for a week fits the first category…

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 天前

    The rest of Canada has your back. At least the people do. I can’t speak for our governments.

  • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 天前

    “As the labour movement in this province, our leaders have made a commitment to rise to that challenge, defend the teachers and their rights, defend worker rights more broadly, and to defend our democracy. We have no choice.”

    [Gil McGowan, president of the Alberta Federation of Labour] stopped short of confirming whether that response would include a provincewide strike, but said, “it’s one of the things that’s actively under consideration."

  • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 天前

    Does anyone know who the actual brains and drivers are behind these UCP moves in Alberta? No way it’s Marlaina.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      Look at people behind separatists. They want to end single payer healthcare indigenous rights and a bunch of other stuff.

      • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 天前

        Who are they, specifically? One cannot come up with strategies to deal with an enemy if only the stooges are known.

      • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        That’s my point. There is too much organization behind these to be something these intellectual powerhouses came up with. So who is really driving the bus, and where are they trying to go?

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 天前

    I’ll be on the lookout for a CLC or AFL-endorsed provincial strike fund, I’d chip in. Solidarity means a slight against some workers is a slight against all of us.