qaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 22 hours agoWho cares about time complexitylemmy.worldimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1378arrow-down11
arrow-up1377arrow-down1imageWho cares about time complexitylemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down2·21 hours agoIIV becomes IIIII, hm?
minus-squaretrxxruraxvr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down1·edit-221 hours agoIIV would never be used. In Roman numerals at most one smaller unit can come in front of a larger one. The code doesn’t do any validation though.
minus-squareMirodir@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up12·19 hours agoWhile it doesn’t say anything about IIV specifically, they sure got creative enough to sometimes subtract more than one of the smaller units from a larger one.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down7·21 hours agoYes, that does demonstrate my point.
IIV becomes IIIII, hm?
IIV would never be used. In Roman numerals at most one smaller unit can come in front of a larger one. The code doesn’t do any validation though.
While it doesn’t say anything about IIV specifically, they sure got creative enough to sometimes subtract more than one of the smaller units from a larger one.
Yes, that does demonstrate my point.