• infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We have the capacity to create biodiesel and methane from sources that fully integrate into the carbon cycle.

    Also we really shouldn’t be putting much stock into resource-based determinism. Coal was not a sine qua non for successful revolutions in Russia, China, Korea, Vietnam, Laos, or Cuba.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      We have the capacity to do that now, with our current level of technology. The question is if we could have reached the capacity to do these things without first burning coal; a hypothetical world where we have to somehow escape from feudalism without coal.

      And don’t dismiss steel. We’re only just now figuring out how to eliminate coal from the process, making steel just from charcoal using iron-age technology is technically doable but so resource intensive and the resulting quality of steel so low that it might never have been able to fuel industrialization. This then limits the extent of mechanization and firearms and railroads etc etc

      It’s harder than you’re giving credit. Revolutionaries in the 1900s didn’t have to overthrow feudalism using guns made from steel forged with charcoal and milled on machines turned by water wheels. We really might have needed coal to get this far.