“These are people I’ve gotten to know over the years,” Trump began. “It started around 2015, and then went into 2016 when the presidency began—officially began—but I’ve known him actually, for a long time.”
Archive article: https://archive.ph/FbA9d#selection-1403.0-1403.206
It is. It’s a problem he and his team are less concerned about right now.
Well he’s a senile delusional loser pedophile. I think there’s room in discourse for that. I think we could also start calling the worst things trump. It worked for santorum.
Don’t call them nasty names; call other things almost as nasty as them their names.
Don’t go in there; I took a big fat steaming trump. Genuinely make this a part of the language. Make it a curse, a swear, a slightly taboo synonym for ‘awful’ ‘tacky’ and ‘low class’
In general, I agree. However, every mention of him without mentioning the Epstein files is a distraction. So, if you want to say something like this senile, old pedofile needs to release the Epstein files, that would be okay. But the Epstein files needs to be continuously kept in the public stream of consciousness or it will be forgotten.
You’re not mentioning him. You’re creating associations.
The Catholic church is notorious for trumping little boys. I just took a big steaming trump. I… I think he put something in my drink but I was still kinda conscious–he trumped me. Over and over again. I need a trump kit and an sti test.
I think it’s fine to brand him the way you’re doing. I am simply stating that any time Trump is mentioned, by name or reference, we need to mention the Epstein files needing to be released.
Its not about branding him, its about branding other things as him.