• Did the gunman acted alone, was there a second shooter?
  • Did Bibi “warcrime” Netanyahu personally assassinated Charlie?
  • Who benefit the most from the assassination, where was Ben Shapiro when Charlie got shot?
  • Where were Hillary Clinton and John Podesta at the time Charlie was shot?
  • Did Trump order the assassination to distract from his Epstein files scandal?
  • Was Charlie a crisis actor, did he fake his own death?
  • STEEL BEAMS CAN’T BEND BULLETS!! WAKE UP EVERYONE
  • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1日前

    In this day and age of AI video editing tools, how do we even know that Charlie Kirk is dead? Combine some practical effects with video editing and you could totally just fake that. And the motive for doing so is right under our noses: The man was married to Erika Kirk.

    Charlie faked his own death to get away from his wife because I mean come on, you listen to her speak and she’s obviously got no charisma or redeeming qualities whatsoever. What’s a brilliant, driven man like Charlie doing with such a wet blanket? But as an Evangelical Christian it would be scandalously sinful for him to just divorce the mother of his children for being boring and offputting, so he had to fake his own death to get away.

  • godlessworm [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1日前

    i believe the shot actually came from the front row very low down where no camera could see. and who with incentive stands at 2”8? ben shapiro, one of kirk’s biggest (and shortest) business competitors. i believe he took the shot. right under our noses where we weren’t looking.

  • Pentacat [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1日前

    I don’t believe any of the conspiracies but I do know this: Kirk didn’t die from a bullet; He died of blood loss with a bullet lodged inside him.

  • stink@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2日前

    Was at a gunshow the other day and my buddy kept on asking chuds about it. Quite a few of them are talking about “inconsistencies” with how he disassembled the gun on the roof and somehow reassembled it later without the tools. Everyone’s sceptic!

    • MalarchoBidenism [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1日前

      It’s so wild to me how the guy told his discord buddies “yeah it was me, I shot him” and turned himself in, but then somehow there’s inconsistencies with the gun, Netanyahu shows up to say “we had nothing to do with this btw” and the FBI releases the most written-by-a-cop text messages ever.

      Looking at all the facts I am forced to conclude that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk, but a shadowy cabal is trying really hard to make it look like he’s being framed. alex-aware

  • CommCat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2日前

    The latest conspiracy I’ve read is from Judge Napolitano (I’ve seen his name on youtube, but have never watched his videos, but he seems to be critical of US geopolitics including Israel). According to him, Charlie Kirk’s wife Erika’s dad worked in the US Defence industry and has connections with Israel. From the few clips I’ve seen posted, Kirk did have some criticisms of Israel’s Genocide in Gaza. So the conspiracy is that Israel/Mossad had Charlie killed, and have Erika take over TPUSA (which she has) and appoint a new TPUSA host that will be very Pro-Israel.

    • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1日前

      Only interesting thing I’ve ever seen Napolitano do is interview John Mearsheimer.

      Mearsheimer’s a weird guy, he called the Ukraine thing (US foreign policy is going to cause a war between Russia and Ukraine) back in the Obama years. He seems like he should be amenable to interviews on leftist outlets but I only see him going to weird right wing libertarians’ shows instead. He denounces the genocide in Palestine and so do his hosts, but none of them ever seem to even consider that they should work with leftists against it.

      • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17時間前

        Isn’t Mearsheimer a neo-con? He probably just thinks the genocide is a waste of resources when the US needs to be pivoting to China (IIRC that’s his take on Russia/Ukraine).

        • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          16時間前

          I’m not sure, he calls himself a realist not a neocon. I genuinely haven’t been able to understand or make sense of his whole ideological position in part because it doesn’t seem like an ideological position so much as just describing what he sees.

          He consistently makes the mouth noises that indicate he thinks killing people is immoral. I haven’t heard him saying the US “needs” to be pivoting to China and I guess I’d be surprised if he had, because that’s a pro war stance and he doesn’t seem pro war. But I think some people who orbit him take that position