• skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    JK Rowling wrote a whole book series about how bullying is a horrible and self-perpetuating cycle, and now spends most of her time bullying a marginalised group

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      JK Rowling

      No, Joanne!

      I.e., I understand she greatly prefers (absolutely detests) being addressed that way. :D

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No.

        Other people’s right to exist is not just “an opinion outside of the mainstream”, and she is not just quietly “having” these opinions.

        Delete your post and don’t make anything like it again. Zero fucking tolerance for Nazis.

        Edit: wait I just had a look and this is a 5-day old troll account posting nazi shit all over Lemmy. Reporting and blocking

          • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            “Alternative Facts” and opinions that do not correlate with reality (like the “opinion” that trans people or any other vulnerable group are in any way lesser beings or do not have the right to exist) are either mental derangement or straight up lies. and these lies are poisonous for communities and lead to to prejudice and violence, so they have to be called out and stopped whenever possible.

            Just like yours.

            • Hector@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              That is a good picture, I like that, I do not see how it fits here. Still is great though.

              • sthetic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I think it references the term “sealioning,” which means: someone on the internet who pops up, like a sealion, into an argument. He says, “BUT WHAT ABOUT XYZ?” which starts everyone responding and debating. But the sealion never continues the conversation. He was just there to disrupt.

                • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  I like how people are actively making up terms to silence those with legitimate questions. Hector is actively questioning and debating. But the kneejerk reaction is to call them sealion and remove their posts. Fucking brilliant.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        She’s literally been denying the Holocaust killed trans people. She funded a court case that made it so that were I live in the UK, it would be illegal for me to piss in any public restroom.

        That’s like saying David Irving was “viciously attacked for having opinions out of the mainstream.”

        • Hector@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nobody that starts to reply with WTF and LOL ever makes it worthwhile point.

          • Octavio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I would normally agree with that, but in this case it’s really the only appropriate response. Did you even see the absolute idiocy khaleer was responding to? I mean, WTF, LOL.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 day ago

                Who gives a fuck if JK Rowling has a less than enlightened view on trans people? Like other than a passing fuck you on that JK rowling, is that what’s really important here?

                If money and fame didn’t equate political influence, then yeah, no-one would give a fuck about her personal opinions.

                As it is though, she’s a billionaire who has helped fund and push through anti-trans (bathroom) legislation in the UK.

                JK Rowling backs protest over Scottish gender bill

                I read her posts about the issue and didn’t find them in and of themselves that problematic if that was just some person’s view. But, again, she’s an influential billionaire who wants to push through laws which actively endanger trans people.

                I still like Harry Potter though, but I’m not gonna fund it in any way. And haven’t, for like 20 years.

                • Hector@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I do not know all the ins and outs, I do know she also opposed Scotland going for Independence which I think was a big mistake for them not to do. She obviously does not have the best opinions or analysis. Still though I think the reaction to her has been outsized to the amount of influence she would have had if not for being constantly attacked.

                  These hedge fund douchebags quietly fund this stuff and cause way more damage than she does without mention for instance.

                  There are no shortage of villains, and she is rather small potatoes. Also though it throws people into the arms of the far right over attacking a popular persona. She would not be meeting with Far Right figures or sponsoring legislation if not for an outsized vicious attack against her shitty opinions.

                  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    21 hours ago

                    I agree that she is basically a distraction from the real issue. How come there are lawmakers that gives the slightest shit about her opinion? There is the issue.

                  • 0ops@piefed.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    She would not be meeting with Far Right figures or sponsoring legislation if not for an outsized vicious attack against her shitty opinions.

                    Except worse because unlike the person in the comic, JKR actually has a lot of capital and influence.

                    There are no shortage of villains, and she is rather small potatoes.

                    Fuck and deride them all, don’t be a slouch, don’t turn a blind eye.

                  • Dasus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    She would not be meeting with Far Right figures or sponsoring legislation if not for an outsized vicious attack against her shitty opinions.

                    “It’s their fault that I hate them and actively fund legislation to make their existence harder and more dangerous. THEIR fault!”

                    Oh cmon you’re not even trying, Hector.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Her opinions are old school mainstream. She’s against the culture shift and if she existed decades ago, she’s be more openly racist rather then transphobic.

      • shapis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I’ve had a couple friends sprout bs like this.

        What I’ve done with them is I ask them to check her twitter out with me. If more than 7 of her most recent 10 tweets at any time aren’t anti trans bs I’ll agree with them that she’s defending herself.

        I’m gonna invite you to whenever you see this message go on her twitter and count. Then come back and tell me if she’s just defending herself or if she made it a huge part of her personality hating a minority.

        • Hector@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Seeing as we lost the public discussion maybe something isn’t working here.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        She is not defending herself. She is attacking. She is funding hate groups with money.

        Fuck Joanne and her stupid wizard world. It’s all built on ideas of imperialism apologia anyway