Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 11 days agoWhen LLMs blow up, what's gonna be the next thing to absorb all the excess GPU productionmessage-squaremessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up187arrow-down1message-squareWhen LLMs blow up, what's gonna be the next thing to absorb all the excess GPU productionKeld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square104fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareThermonuclearEgg [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 days agoI do, not because they make any attempt to hide it (cf. Microsoft), but because people are willing to spend their own money to buy a product marketed as an “AI-powered voice assistant” instead of an “always-on surveillance mic”
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 days agoI think they’ll split the difference. On the store shelf it will be called an "AI-powered voice assistant” because branding still matters. At shareholder meetings or for the WSJ they’ll openly call it an “always-on surveillance mic” because they don’t need to hide.
I do, not because they make any attempt to hide it (cf. Microsoft), but because people are willing to spend their own money to buy a product marketed as an “AI-powered voice assistant” instead of an “always-on surveillance mic”
I think they’ll split the difference.
On the store shelf it will be called an "AI-powered voice assistant” because branding still matters.
At shareholder meetings or for the WSJ they’ll openly call it an “always-on surveillance mic” because they don’t need to hide.