• npdean@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    There is something seriously wrong in US if China seems the saner one

    • MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve been mean enough, and that to some comrade’s, recently, so I’ll reach out the olive branch here instead of the dunk.

      Maybe take this moment to reflect and try to read Chinese propaganda as equal but different to Western propaganda (I use this word without any negative associations, just literally works of media meant to convince of some position). Try to take it at face value, allow yourself to create that version of the world temporarily in your mind, and compare it to the world that you must create in your head daily to accept that the west is generally better than China on moral issues. What sort of information would you need to read and believe to accept that works where China is better? Is that a reasonable level of doubt? and is it possible that those arguments are already out there and you just need to decide your how your belief-boundaries are sketched for whether or not they can fit into it?

      • ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        In social sciences propaganda just means political art, its not an automatically negative thing - its all about the message it has and the ideology behind the message, and if it is misleading or accurate.

            • MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              True. I do think that there is a qualitative difference, though, between propaganda to convince someone of a very specific position with regards to history like “June 6th incident was a tragedy but caused by a CIA coup” and this sort of general encouragement propaganda. But both are propaganda surely

              • ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                of course, one was intended to mislead to accomplish covert and overt political actions by the upper class - but also the story behind that muscle girl is as misleading as the June 6th one tbh - women got encouraged to enter the work force, then when the war ended they where told to go back in the kitchen and wouldn’t gain rights like laws against martial rape, no fault divorces, the ability to own a bank account or the ability to drink alcohol in a pub till the 90s - It was a promise of rights and of autonomy that was ripped away from them.

                • MLRL_Commie [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  To be clear, I totally take the Chinese side of the June 6th incident, the side with actual facts, witnesses, etc. By you using that phrase, I assume you do too, but for the sake of this thread I’m going to make that clear.

                  I agree that propaganda also Always implicitly and explicitly makes an argument for the entirety of the society and current ideological push of the class/state that creates it! But whether that is implicit (the propaganda can be directly true or have no “truth” value at all, but is undergirded by lies) or explicit (June 6th as China says is the truth, not the other claims) is a difference which is relevant to mention for convincing the OP of this thread, and for making our arguments clearer

    • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wait, you’re telling me that the country that’s never dropped a single bomb on another country, hasn’t been involved in any major wars since 1979, doesn’t have a decades long tradition of supporting foreign coups and overthrowing democratically elected leaders in the name of freedom and democracy, never sanctions other countries for not serving their interests, is saner than a country that does all the aforementioned? Wow, I didn’t know that. You’re telling me now for the first time.

        • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          the only reason to have your expectation be that the US is better on such an issue is that you believe a load of racist propaganda.

          consider how you’re using the concept of sanity there.

          i’ll wait countdown

        • m532@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 days ago

          Its funny how white supremacists prefer acting as if they dont have a brain over standing up to their hitlerite beliefs, the fucking cowards.