Highly unusual list includes 533 businesses and trade organisations

Donald Trump has drawn up a scorecard for corporate America, ranking companies based on their loyalty to his administration.

The highly unusual list ranks 533 businesses and trade organisations based on their efforts to champion the US president’s “one big beautiful bill”, according to reports.

Companies that have fared well deployed a variety of tactics – often trumpeting the benefits of an individual policy, such as Uber’s celebration of Mr Trump’s “no tax on tips” proposal.

The scorecard, which Axios said will aid decision-making on corporate requests, comes as part of Mr Trump’s “America First” agenda and protectionist policies.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Those are indeed much better examples of changes we need but we are rapidly approaching the point where those changes are too late. Given the severity of the likely impact, we need the urgency to act in greater desperation. By all means we need to go all out with renewable energy, net zero, walkable cities, and so many more transformation of modern society. It is the only sustainable approach. But is it too little, too late? At what point do we need to take more desperate measures?

    We need to at least develop a better understanding of terraforming earth because that may quickly become our best hope

    • crandlecan@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      We already passed that point. It already is too late. Your proposed solutions are too little too late. All these things had to have happened in the mid 90s at the latest. Instead, we doubled down on energy efficiency, which makes the bad thing only cheaper to use and thus the net pollution increases while sealing our future.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        All these things had to have happened in the mid 90s at the latest

        Wrong, If you are correct, though, the only correct way to proceed is to completely exterminate all human life on the planet, since we are obviously the problem.

        What we are long past is maintaining the current level of consumption the western world does, and maintain current climate.

        Note, the only ones reducing consumption and pollution of the working class. Jeff Bezos still dumps tons of carbon into the air needlessly, just to go golfing.

        • crandlecan@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          If you are correct, though, the only correct way to proceed is to completely exterminate all human life on the planet, since we are obviously the problem.

          Didn’t you pay attention? Even if we stopped all pollution today, it’s too late. The temperatures will keep increasing. Up to 7 degrees at least. The only thing that can save this current epoch is humanity. But it will need extreme measures. And we’ll need them yesterday.

          Edit: Yes, the Climate Crisis May Wipe out Six Billion People

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Didn’t you pay attention? Even if we stopped all pollution today, it’s too late.

            I didn’t say just stop all pollution. We can reforest, and repair the damage we did.

            The only thing that can save this current epoch is humanity.

            If this is the case, then your original premise is false, that there’s nothing to be done.

            But it will need extreme measures. And we’ll need them yesterday.

            Yes, extreme measures like abolishing capitalism, reducing our consumption models, and repairing the damage we’ve done.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Those are indeed much better examples of changes we need but we are rapidly approaching the point where those changes are too late.

      That is a myth. We are not past the point of healing the planet. If we are, then we should just self-exterminate, so the planet can heal itself, which it will, once we’re gone.

      We’re past the point of maintaining the current consumption model of western nations, and maintaining a status quo, or return, to pre-industrialization levels of pollution.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        We’re rapidly approaching several possible tipping points that will “rapidly” (over decades or a century) make many of the most populated parts of the world much less livable, disrupt agriculture on a global scale, cause mass die offs, disrupt water supplies and weather patterns.

        The only thing “saving” us is the uncertainty: we’re not good at predicting them yet (since they’ve never happened in the history of the earth) so we don’t know how desperate we need to be

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          We’re rapidly approaching several possible tipping points that will “rapidly” (over decades or a century) make many of the most populated parts of the world much less livable, disrupt agriculture on a global scale, cause mass die offs, disrupt water supplies and weather patterns.

          I agree with this statement. Those “tipping points” however can be walked back, by doing things like actually repairing the damage we’ve done, instead of just reducing the amount of damage.

          The only thing “saving” us is the uncertainty: we’re not good at predicting them yet (since they’ve never happened in the history of the earth) so we don’t know how desperate we need to be

          I can make one prediction with near 100% certainty: As long as we maintain out current economic model, human life on this planet will likely cease to exist within the next couple hundred years.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Those “tipping points” however can be walked back

            They really can’t. They’re called tipping points because they’re likely irreversible, in society terms.

            • if the Greenland ice sheet melts, raising sea level by 23 feet, nothing we can do will bring it back for longer than civilization may exist
            • if AMOC collapses, radically changing the climate of Western Europe, there’s nothing we can do to restart it
            • if melting permafrost or rainforest devastation enters a self-sustains collapse maybe that’s conceivable to halt but very unlikely.
            • if West Antarctic ice shelf collapses, how can any remediation make up for one of the driest climates on earth where even using ideal conditions it would take many centuries for snowfall to possibly be enough, then even more centuries for a glacier to extend a new ice shelf. And we have no way of creating those ideal conditions

            As we approach these tipping points we’re quickly running out of things we can do, and the scariest part is we can’t even predict when it’s too late and probably won’t until well afterword

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Most all of these can be prevented, and even reversed, if we: Drastically reduce our consumption based lifestyles, reforest places like the Amazon (Our planet’s lungs), and get creative with other methods (ie, algae cultivation on a large scale).

              But, these all require abolishing capitalism, in order to be done.