• SippyCup@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve never been a religious man but the fact that the sitting president closely matches the description of the antichrist and Mamdani showing up has got me asking some questions.

  • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a good bit, I admit.

    I do want to note that in the Gospels and really basically everything remotely intended to portray “eye witness” events of regarding Jesus (still stories that copy heavily from one another, hardly multiple accounts), the main message is, over and over again, “Jesus is special, you must believe in him over everything else”. Reading these texts, the message is not, “love each other and live in community”, it is, “eschew all else if that is what it takes to believe in me, even if that means being kind to your enemies”. Just about every parable is just iterations on the theme of, “Jesus is special, he does miracles, you need to believe over all else”. The Gospels are written with the exoectation that this would all be wrapped up during their lifetimes, as in Jesus was coming back on Thursday so you better start believing and stop focusing on worldly things.

    Which is to say, the figure of Jesus is not exactly socialist, as socialists focus on the material, on community, of creating a better world through the destruction of capitalism. The figure of Jesus is more like a hippie that says, “screw all of that, join my cult, nothing else matters”.

    Anyways do with this what you will. The “Jesus was socialist” angle is still decent agitprop because most self-proclaimed Christians haven’t read The Gospels. Very few people are really engaging with the figure or reading critically, they just learn parables in isolation and a local religious figure tells them what to believe about it.

    • MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      This all doesn’t matter because no matter how you look at it the “Islam Doesn’t belong in the west” crowd believes in also something completely different

      If Islam and Judaism were incompatible with the west than Christianity also would be incompatible

    • lapis [fae/faer, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Very few people are really engaging with the figure or reading critically

      well yeah, that’s because those of us who did have largely either left the religion entirely or reworked a sort of extremely personalized variant of it.

      • Chana [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes or become more abstract about it, accepting the many faults to try and recover a consistent thread tying it all together. Many modern sects are basically variants on these kinds of attempts trying to square scripture and modern culture and society. There are also many people in that quasi-Christian space between being a hardcore believer and an atheist with Christian biases, especially liberals in the imperial core. Like folks that go to a Unitarian church and identify as Christian and think Jesus did some of that stuff and pray to him but done think about it too much because church is a place for community more than being a cloistering nerd.

    • Crucible [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn

      “ ‘a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law— a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’

      “Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. Whoever does not take up their cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life for my sake will find it."

      Matthew 10:35-39

      Not a lot of love and unity from this fella if you don’t like him the most. As you say, it’s valuable agitprop but damn if it doesn’t drive a bit of me nuts

  • Des [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    yeah shit is getting weird.

    my former co-worker was a devout christian with lefty tendencies and strongly believed Revelations would be entirely driven by “inspired” humans and totally non-supernatural. he was leaning on his own hypothesis that god’s influence is entirely through the collective totality of humanity, within physical laws. he thought the prophecies were just perceived as such by minds incapable of grasping the modern world.

    so yeah. maybe he was onto something

    hopefully the earthly paradise is just world communism

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Matthew 25:42-45 (NIV)

      42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink,

      43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’

      44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’

      45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’

      Reminder that at one point in time in the US, there were actually Chistian (proto) socialists and abolitionists, not all these rabid and hateful, death cultist, supply-side Jesusfreaks.

      (There were of course a lot of rather hateful Christians as well, but at least some of them used to seem to actually mean well)