“They’re replacing Steak n Shake with a halal restaurant.

Somebody get your mans, this dude is fucking dying holy shit lmaoooo

  • TheVelvetGentleman [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    The only real difference between halal chicken and non-halal chicken is that the halal chicken has to be conscious when it’s killed. This does not improve the quality of the meat, it just makes the chicken suffer more than it needs to.

    • theturtlemoves [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      CW: death of animal

      There are a few requirements for meat to be halal, such as killing humanely (usually by a single stroke of a sharp knife), and making sure the animal is healthy and has not been ill-treated. Some say that this improves the taste, as frightened animals produce lactic acid, which sours and hardens the meat.

      • TheVelvetGentleman [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You left out the part where the animal has to be conscious, which, like I said, is the only real difference. Even if you believe that you can taste the fear in your animal product, wouldn’t the animal being unconscious for the process produce less?

        • theturtlemoves [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          What I understand is that the consciousness requirement was placed so that people could verify that the animal was healthy and had not been ill-treated. Stunning is allowed after examination and before slaughter. Meat certified by the UK Halal Food Authority, for example, is from stunned animals.