• gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just want her to run for president. But after fielding 2 uninspiring establishment centre-right candidates with no grassroots base, that offer nothing exciting, the Democrats and even many voters think that women in general are unelectable.

    • lumony@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah. Democrats chose to run some of the worst candidates in history.

      It’s sad that now a female candidate guarantees a trump victory. Nominating conservative female candidates did more harm than good.

    • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I just don’t think very highly of Americans in general. They are too sexist, too racist, and too elitist.

      They want a rich old white man. Only one time ever did they attempt something else, and that lead directly to a third of the country becoming extremists.

      I love AOC. Hope she will become president one day. But please just run with someone that your sexist, racist, elitist neighbors can actually vote for.

      Let AOC become Senate majority leader first. That would be really cool, impactful, and help people get used to her.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        AOC is having a fucking moment, so naturally women of color suddenly can’t win. Sanders got raked over the coals for just being accused of saying something like that to Warren. But it’s sure different now that the party can’t use it as a weapon against a progressive. Now they’re trying to keep AOC from running. So the party will hold back all women in order to hold back one progressive woman.

        Let AOC become Senate majority leader first. That would be really cool, impactful, and help people get used to her.

        It will give us time to think of a new excuse.

        • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          How is it sudden? Trump won both times you tried running women as president. Your fellow countrymen are bigots, have you not noticed that yet?

          I know you want it, its fine. But the world cant take 4 extra years of whoever heritage chooses to dismantle democracy for them, if i happen to be right.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            How is it sudden?

            Because there’s speculation that AOC might run.

            Trump won both times you tried running women as president.

            Trump won both times we ran uninspiring centrist women for president. AOC is neither uninspiring nor centrist.

            Your fellow countrymen are bigots, have you not noticed that yet?

            The ones you want to impress certainly are.

            • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              You have 50mil eligible voters who haven’t even registered. You have another 40 million registered voters that didn’t bother to show.

              I agree with you that AOC is the best bet America has for a better future. But the important thing is not getting the best outcome, the important thing is actually beating the Nazis.

              Are you willing to bet the future of the free world that you are right? I simply don’t have enough faith in the American people. You keep disappointing.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                You have 50mil eligible voters who haven’t even registered. You have another 40 million registered voters that didn’t bother to show.

                Yes, voter apathy is a problem. Running uninspiring candidates isn’t going to fix apathy; it will make apathy much worse.

                I agree with you that AOC is the best bet America has for a better future. But the important thing is not getting the best outcome, the important thing is actually beating the Nazis.

                Ain’t seein’ much evidence of anyone else actually willing to oppose nazis in any way.

                Are you willing to bet the future of the free world that you are right?

                The last 3 elections have been against trump. We ran dull “not trump, I guess” candidates in all three. Biden only barely squeaked in and then spent four years demonstrating that democrats don’t keep their promises to anyone not named netanyahu.

                If you have a more charismatic candidate than AOC, a white (conservative, naturally, since that’s all this is really about) male, name him.

                • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Tim Walz is literally doing Town Hall meeting in Republican cities where they have stopped doing official town hall meetings.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    And god bless him for it. If Tim Walz can win in 2028, great.

                    That’s no reason to hold back all women in order to hold back AOC. We have primaries for a reason (when we have primaries.) If AOC can overcome democrats’ shady bullshit meant to keep progressives out, she absolutely can win. Anyone who would never vote for AOC wasn’t going to vote for Walz, either. Unless you’re saying that centrist democrats would rather vote for fascism or stay home than vote for a progressive, for all their talk of “no matter who.”

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’d LOVE to see AOC as president, but I think this post is sopt on perfect. I think she could do some amazing good as Senate Minority, and eventually Majority Leader, and become president a bit later in life.

        Gerald Ford was once addressing a classroom, and one of the kids asked him if a woman would ever be President, and he said that a woman would definitely be president someday, but the first woman president wouldnt be directly elected. He thought the first woman president would be a vice president, who gets promoted when the president dies. After that, a woman wouldn’t have a problem getting elected. I thought that was a pretty insightful read on the weird bigotry of Americans.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah I vehemently disagree with this. The racist sexist bigots aren’t going to vote democrat no matter what. Kamala spent a lot of time trying to court the “”“moderate”" republicans and it didn’t work.

        Obama won because he had a base and he got people excited. People still remember “Yes we can” and just the general hope and inspiration he brought.

        And honestly to even suggest the radicalisation of the right was due to Obama is crazy.

        • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          The racist sexist bigots aren’t going to vote democrat no matter what.

          Don’t make the mistake of thinking that racism and especially sexism don’t exist within the Democratic voting base. They are much less of a problem than within the Republican voting base, but they are still significant enough to swing elections.

          And honestly to even suggest the radicalisation of the right was due to Obama is crazy.

          Not solely due to Obama, but his existence in the White House did get a lot of people to take off their masks.