• happybadger [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    6 months ago

    The article doesn’t seem to mention it, but last week they accidentally sent out a mandatory evacuation order to all 10 million phones: https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/emergency-evacuation-alert-sent-to-residents-across-la-county/

    I wonder how much that will dampen the effect of the real order if it comes. Colorado sends emergency alerts for so much- missing children and geriatrics, violence against cops anywhere in the state- that there’s a lot of notification fatigue when we get the handful of wildfire alerts each year.

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s one of the fundamental problems of outrage-driven engagement and for profit news. Eventually people burn out and tune out. Then something important happens and people are ambivalent. Some people wallow in it and go bananas (see: fox News chuds) but the majority of people don’t like being harangued by spectacle every goddamn day.

  • Cimbazarov [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is really sad. But we’re also seeing what happens when you let corporations go unchecked and exacerbate climate change.

    An entire city burning to the ground should be a radicalizing point, but I’m afraid the media is going to do everything they can to divert from the climate question to things like firefighter funding, DEI etc.

      • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        Its crazy because every right winger is talking about LA running out of water which is obviously untrue. Most angelenos (except maybe those in actively byrning or burnt areas) still has clean water coming from their tap. And more importantly, we all see water drop after water drop on the TV coverage. The actual crews fighting the fire havent indicated any trouble getting water and there are dozens of reservoirs available.

        • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah but if the almond trees had more water they wouldn’t be as dry (in January) and wouldn’t have caught flame. That’s trump’s argument lmao, it’s so stupid it’s unbelievable. The fire didn’t spread cross farms it spread across forest, suburban housing developments and rough hills

          • Cimbazarov [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yea that’s what I don’t get a out his whole “I told Newsom to sweep the leaves from the forests” because I thought this fire started in the urban area

    • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lib media at least acknowledges it’s climate change but their solution is to vote blue harder next time. Meanwhile the chuds go over world events with a fine tooth comb to find a minority to scapegoat. Both are not helpful in any way.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not just a city, but the richest city in the richest state of the richest country

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      There was a conversation about this here a few months ago. Seriously what happens when these places get too hot to live in? If it turns into 145° temperatures in Las Vegas, for example, will we just abandon the city, turning it into a ghost town? Even while inside, you can’t stay cool because of the power consumption. You can’t just be blaring the AC 24/7 in every building and every car. Not to mention, you can’t cool the outside of cars or buildings, so those could overheat. How do you get food and water to these places? I suppose they could build high speed rail going in and out of the city, but you still run into the same problems of having to keep the entire thing refrigerated.

      Now multiply this for hundreds of cities, towns, and shotgun shacks across the southern US. Will the entire state of Texas have to leave because nighttime temperatures are over 150°? Just miles and miles of Death Valley conditions spread out across the South.

      I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention how things will be worse south of the border going into Mexico and South America.

      • TheModerateTankie [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        The first warning sign will be insurance companies pulling out of entire regions, like what happened in California.

        Might be survivable if people adapted and figured out ways to conserve water and energy and build better, more resiliant infrastructure, but that’s not going to happen in this country.

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 months ago

    I suppose it’s a small mercy that THE BIG ONE turned out to be a wildfire and not an earthquake, since that would’ve killed far more people

  • anarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not to be a “source?” lib, but where did you read that all of LA was warned to be ready to evacuate?

    It wasn’t in the article, as far as I could tell, and I haven’t followed its growth but LA is so massive I can’t imagine it’s large enough yet to take over LA as a whole to warrant that warning.