oo1

you right they’re not meaningless.
In the hands of the right demagogue they can be powerful tools for creating and extending stimgatisation and division - and undermining society and weakening the grown-up methods of resolving social stresses.

Daryl Davis arguably did try to get along with the kkk.
There might not be many like him and it might be a drop in the ocean, but at least it isn’t no-one who wants to try to do the difficult thing.

here’s a tune for you
https://yt.artemislena.eu/watch?v=Rn9Dkg_vRJc

billionaires lives are made near unliveable by the evil tax system that exploits all their hard work to benefit the lazy
/s

A lot of trickle down economics fans in this thread.

I think your argument works if someone is stealing the beef.

If they are buying it then that is directly funding that “90%”.

eexclude value of average (maybe median) cost of a dwelling off their dwelling.

fuck this “my primary dwelling is a $10m mansion”

The rock . . . and a piece of string to wind around.

As i understand it it (somewhere between barely and not at all) the idea is not that It’s “expanding” in the sense of a balloon inflating into the space around it.
Its more stretching internally.

So the distance (or time it would take at constant speed) between any 2 points is geting bigger.
You could maybe also say it’d take more energy to move between the points in a set time.

There’s probably nothing outside, but the distances inside get longer.

It’s probably something to go with gravity, momentum and entropy. The actual concept of “distance” between things might not be what we think.

But all these theories give rise to the concet of large amounts ob unobserved ‘dark’ mattter and evergy, so the actual basis of currently observable fact (i.e. energy / mass) is a small fraction of what is needed for these theories to work.

I get all my news from spiders.
Apparently there’s a troubling fly shortage going on.
And the silk purists are trying to outlaw the use of carbon nanotubes.

edit - deleting my comment
, i didnt notice which forum.
actual answer is: showerthoughts or something?

Yeah, Tina Turner tried this but Mel Gibson came along and ruined it.

Normally I like to treat questions like telephone calls; ignore them for as long as you can and hope they go away.
I guess that is basically defensive but maybe “passive defensive”.
It’s what I do to viruses too.

imbibed like tequila?

expeachable

x

yes, like when you google:
“Oslo traffic deaths”

pretty cool stuff.

you’d have to encrypt your messages, and manage who has the keys for it to be private.

really useless lame experiment

Yeah, me happily using styles getting a manageable layout . . . . that’s more or less consistent with the business style guide.
Any other f*cker even sniffs at my document . . .

Also me: Why do we have to use MS software?
Bosses: Everyone knows how to use it.

In w98 times you could still run wp 5.2
I mean i “had win98” but mostly just booted to dos anyway.

even when WP went wysiwig I found “reveal codes” was far better than word to understand what the formatting was actually doing.