

Please read the rest of the comment
Please read the rest of the comment
Your points don’t get better just because you coined/found a new term
Needs reasoning
Man, that’s a sweet ass-car.
There’s really no excuse for this
There’s research in this area, I don’t feel like debating it as if it were a matter of opinion.
I accept it; I enjoy most types of meat. But the fact that you can survive without meat makes it optional, which is relevant to the debate we were having about the morality of killing/harming animals for different purposes.
Yeah, it’s harder for sure. But what I’m saying is that not everyone needs to kill to eat-- if you can afford it and have some time to plan meals, it isn’t a “necessary evil”. I’d argue it’s still more moral to kill for food than for entertainment, of course.
We need things that can be found in meat. With some effort, you can obtain them from alternative sources.
You speak on matters which you do not understand
You have to eat, but you don’t have to eat meat. It’s just as optional as creating art that involves animal abuse. (Not a vegan, just interested in this topic).
At lesbian board game night
As all good stories start
Doorbells are the simplest electronic component known to man (literally just a button). You can totally unscrew it and disconnect it inside
Seems reasonable to me
All I can do is laugh, and I intend to do it heartily
He’s a true American PATRIOT who loves America BIGLY
Her name was Susan or did she not change it?
Dweezil is an amazing name
Words have meaning if you have the capability to read