I guess for a similar reason as to why you’re exasperated at my comment. Also because I scroll through the headline and initially think, ‘more bad news’… When it’s not!
I guess for a similar reason as to why you’re exasperated at my comment. Also because I scroll through the headline and initially think, ‘more bad news’… When it’s not!
I find it so odd that positive news is titled using negative words like ‘slowing’ and ‘loss’. Makes me sad.
Yes babies are supposed to be fat. But not from sugar. To the best of my knowledge , when they are older and able to consume solid foods, things like actual fat or butter are fine ( the stuff that clogs arteries etc) but there is no point in a baby’s development that requires sugar as a necessity.
So it’s not really that the article is based on guidelines for adults and applying it to babies. It’s simply that the guideline for babies is that sugar is not necessary and can actually be more harmful than a multitude of other alternatives that can fulfill the same energy requirements of a baby subsistent wholly on milk.
No you need something pointed.
Didn’t realise Tachiyomi was dead.
Easy. Co(ld)yo
Hear hear. This is quite literally a shitty million dollar idea