From Europe, never had a slimy coating on my eggs.

Also, if you want to discuss the nuances of some niche philosophical topic, I’m absolutely sure you can do that here. You just have to start the discussion and not wait for something to come your way.

I’m trying to grow as a person and figure things out about the world.

+

I’m not interested in talking about people, and for the most part, I’m not interested in talking about events either.

You do know the world mostly consists of people and events? And that you yourself are mostly affected by people and events?

Growing as a person as well as figure things out about the world is basically exactly what’s happening when you talk about people or events.

Philosophy is actually barely useful for both (in a direct sense, of course it’s really useful to find the best reasons for doing it in the first place). More for growing as a person than figuring out the world.

I usually have so little oil left I just put enough dish soap in that it all mixes with water… Does that still clog my pipes?

Forget that, you guys have a stove or a barbecue? I have no place to burn anything

It was about 20$ per day, not top cash

I would really like to know what’s the resulting materials after the breaking down, but the article doesn’t say :(

I have no clue exactly, and forgive me if this is inappropriate, but I could imagine porn would work maybe?

You don’t lose an action to get them back up. Healing Word is a bonus action. Healing before going down actually wastes many many more actions, because yeah you’re spending the actions to heal all the time instead of doing damage/disables and removing enemies from the fight. Damage prevention in killing/disabling enemies is much better than healing against it, since healing spells have so small values compared to damage spells. Just compare Cure Wounds and Chromatic Orb.

In fact I haven’t even said the best benefit of only using healing spells when someone goes down: if an enemy does 30 damage per round and you try to heal against it, you need to heal 30 hp per round, good luck ever achieving that. But if you heal only when someone goes down, you can heal as little as 1hp, with exactly the same effect. Essentially you’re using minimal resources, can do that heal with lvl 1 spell slots, while keeping one strong enemy essentially stunned since they “waste” their turn re-downing the one character that just gets healed by 1hp each round.

Donation, federation (spreading the load so that a single person’s hosting cost are easy for them to cover), non-intrusive premium features, public funding

I block ads specifically so websites that rely on ads as revenue die.

I want businesses relying on ads to die though. Doesn’t work if too few people use adblockers.

I’d rather make the wrong choice than the scary choice.

Unrelated to the topic, but this mindset is exactly why far-right movements are getting so strong right now.

It’s because I’m shallow. Visuals are important to me. I know my preferences, and no/barely any hair on the head is ugly to me. Doesn’t take anything away from the rest of the comment though.

There is so much to unpack in this post, I don’t even know where to begin.

longer hair was making her depressed

No way a hairstyle is the root cause for her being depressed.

You/she need to figure out the real reasons.

But also why a change in hairstyle at all would have any impact at all, I feel this should be such an irrelevant thing on mental state. An interesting question would be, if she were on a lonely island with no one there but her, would her hairstyle still have a large impact on her being depressed? Why? (For me hairstyles/any appearance change are just signals for other people)

In general I agree that your looks are not for yourself, but for your partner. I’d change almost everything about myself as long as it wasn’t a huge maintenance investment (which specific long hair can be, but can also be simple). I don’t understand anyone that chooses a look only for themselves. You don’t even see yourself unless you search for a mirror!

I couldn’t be with a woman with a buzz cut (by choice, when alternatives exist) either.

I don’t use a wallet and put my bank card and id card in it, I don’t need anything else

With xposed you can do everything, which is not graphene exclusive.

Because more medium businesses will fill the need, people that are not at the cap yet. And qualified workers, equipment or work areas are all resources, which eventually will be reallocated to whatever is in demand. I didn’t specify a timeframe with my “temporarily”, but I was talking decades, i.e. also enough time for new workers to be trained.

That’s why I said temporarily. If there’s demand for millions of more cars, capitalists will find a way to provide the supply very quickly. There’ll be less demand for idk, private jets or sth billionaires buy, and the resources previously used for the fulfillment of billionaire demand will start going to fulfilling the demand of the new things desired by lower classes that now have more money. Obviously it’ll not happen instantly because stuff needs to be repurposed, new supply paths created, but eventually, the resource usage will be equal again.

You’re talking (partly) about two different things.

The simple truth is that our planet only has a certain amount of replenishable resources which leads to only a certain standard of living being possible for a certain amount of people.

Thus, the problem you’re talking about only gets solved by reducing the amount of people or the standard of living, globally.

The problem OP is talking about is inequality in the standard of living between people.

Outlawing billionaires alleviates both problems, but the general resources problem only temporarily until the people with lower standard of living now raise theirs by having more resources available, which is what you talk about.

Inequality gets improved permanently by this, so it’s a good change for that problem.

The limited resource problem you’re talking about, though, doesn’t get solved by this at all, there might be a short dip in less resources used while resources are being reallocated, but then it’ll likely go back to before, because most people use as much resources as they can to make their lives as nice as they can.

To solve our problems, both population as well as standard of living need to be limited. Because if either one is allowed to grow infinitely, resources will never suffice long-term.