• Anarcho-Bolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      [Transcript]

      In January 1923, the young journalist Ernest Hemingway covered the Lausanne Conference for the Toronto Daily Star. His first encounter with Mussolini left him distinctly unimpressed. Ushered into a room along with other journalists, Hemingway found the Premier so deeply absorbed in a book that he did not bother to look up. Curious, Hemingway “tiptoed over behind him to see what the book was he was reading with such avid interest. It was a French–English dictionary—held upside down.”¹

        • Anarcho-Bolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Doing a search on Google Books regarding Mussolini and the United States, I came across a good work titled The United States and Fascist Italy: The Rise of American Finance in Europe, which in turn lead me to Mussolini and Fascism: The View from America, and I found copies thereof on Library Genesis.

      • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Meanwhile, a certain V. Ulyanov stated around the same time that Mussolini’s defection to fascism was a “huge loss” for the socialist movement.

              • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                You have it the wrong way around. Defection wasn’t some accident of history that ended up being consequential, it was something with a substantial lead-up.

                People don’t try on different political hats and then change their philosophy. They have a set philosophy, and they try to make sense of what politics are the most reachable, and then if those don’t work out, they change their politics.

                Political views are downstream from values, which in turn are downstream from worldview and philosophy. If you have people who self-identify as socialists but who have a might-makes-right outlook on the world, they’re not going to stay socialists for long.

                  • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I’m not lecturing a dead man, I’m pointing out how the Bolsheviks, at an earlier time, were more likely to be prone to certain mistakes that we have less excuse to make ourselves.

                    You shouldn’t be interested in any kind of formal association with people that prove themselves to be reactionaries. Red-brown alliances are only going to strengthen fascists by giving them the appearance of working-class support.