For what it’s worth, vegan chicken nuggets are at a point now where they’re basically just better than real nuggets. They’ve got the taste down pretty close to real chicken, and the texture is better since there’s no gristle or nasty shit. Strong recommendation for MorningStar Farms as a baseline.
I’m going to add vegan bones to your vegan boneless wings
I was juste thinking about if vegans had their chicken nuggent equivalent. That’s cool to know!
Last ones I saw were mostly comprised of sodium.
Just like the non-vegan ones!
No though.
Delicious sodium
I can’t imagine the levels of inorganic chemistry required to make pretend chicken. Read the labels on this shit.
It’ll taste even better knowing that it’s a triumph of knowledge over nature.
This is why I don’t eat Beyond Meat and Impossible burgers… they’re likely even worse for you than what they’re purporting to be the healthy alternative to
Can you give any reason why you believe they are likely worse for you outside of nature=good manmade=bad?
Is that not a good enough reason?
only if you accept the same reasoning for medicine
It’s a ridiculous reason, and one founded on romanticist views of an idealised nature that does not exist.
I’m sure some marketing suggests these things are healthier, but they’re really just an animal-cruelty free alternative.
This is like when coworkers ask if a vegan is vegan for health reasons. I’m sure as hell not, I eat like shit lmao. Just no animal products.
Can I get uhhhhhhh 🅱️oneless cow tools
doesn’t this set a precedent to destroy basically all false advertising rules ever? your nut-free products can now contain nuts, because fuck you. your meatless burgers can be made of cats. your arsenic-free soda can give you arsenic poisoning, fuck it. i don’t know anything about the usamerikkan legal system, but how can this possibly hold up?
“Boneless” “wings” now with bones and not made of wings! Boned chicken nuggets
Couldn’t disagree more with the the ruling, the dissenting opinion is right.
You don’t expect a bone fragment in breast meat, which is what boneless wings typically are. Even the argument that “boneless” is a style of preparation, it doesn’t make sense to expect bones.
The court probably doesn’t want to imply it should be made from a specific (more expensive) cut of meat, but even in the pink-sludge-style nuggets you shouldn’t get a bone either.
I feel bad for the guy who has to pay for his own healthcare now.
Even the argument that “boneless” is a style of preparation
“Boneless” even as a style of preparation strongly suggest, well, removing bones.
They figure if you can sell unlimited data as an ISP or cellular carrier that is quite limited in every sense of the word, then why not boney boneless chikin?
Death to America
boneless wings aren’t even made from the fuckin wings for fucks sake i’m so fucking angry
The second stage is perversion of reality, where people come to believe that the sign is an unfaithful copy, which “masks and denatures” reality as an “evil appearance—it is of the order of maleficence”. Here, signs and images do not faithfully reveal reality to us, but can hint at the existence of an obscure reality which the sign itself is incapable of encapsulating.
This is stupid from every direction imaginable.
Boneless doesn’t mean boneless? Oh, okay. Words don’t mean things anymore. Cool.
But also, imagine inhaling your nuggies so fucking fast that you don’t notice a fucking bone in your mouth. Do you just not chew your food? Pour that slop right down my esophagus, fuck yeah.
If you don’t expect a fucking bone in your food and it’s suddenly there then it makes sense to inhale it on accident. Could happen to anyone even if they ate slowly
plenty of people have problems chewing or digesting food, which is why they’d go for something softer and guaranteed to be safer like boneless chicken
You’re right, it’s ableist of me to criticize people for chugging meat like it’s a smoothie. I’m a bad comrade. There’s actually no other sources of protein that don’t have bones.
people who are disabled, old people, people with textural issues
but im glad you responded in good faith to what i was saying and found a way we can just dismiss them all
people who are disabled, old people, people with textural issues
This is the carnist equivalent of a lib criticizing a communist for using a cell phone
I’m not going to delete your carnist apologism but I’m also not going to act on your report of this post. There’s nothing in the story to suggest that the chicken bone guy is anything more than a bog standard meat eater. Don’t shelter carnist apologism with baseless accusations of ableism.
i’m sorry but maybe i’m not understanding - I’m not in any way defending carnism, hell im not even trying to defend the guy but the original commenter came out the gate about ‘nuggies’ and not digesting and chewing food and all i said is that some people have problems chewing or digesting food, which is why they might not chew or they might go for something without bones. As someone who works in healthcare and in aged care, i just thought it was worth piping up and saying that. They then responded to me, implying that I’m trying to call them ableist (which i never did in my first comment, so they’re jacketing me - i am literally just trying to make sure all angles are fairly considered) and that I’m trying to insinuate they’re a ‘bad comrade’ and then tying this to me defending carnism, which again I am not. and again i am not trying to defend this guy in any way. i get it if I misunderstood something here, but this genuinely feels like its coming at me for something im not trying to imply at all, but if I’m missing something I’m sorry
edited to add: the reason the report says ‘doubling down on ableism’ is because i never brought up ableism, they did, and then in the next sentence dismissed me for calling them ableist, which again I never did, which seems to imply to me that they don’t care about ableism. maybe I’m wrong, I’d be willing to accept that, but again i never pulled any of these accusations first.
There’s nothing in the story to suggest that the chicken bone guy is anything more than a bog standard meat eater.
they wouldn’t bother asking, why would such information be included unless the guy was literally an activist?
Don’t go around showing off your beanis.
Meh. Just because he’s disabled doesn’t mean he doesn’t deserve to be happy and eat tasty food and not just vegan replacements.
DAE vegan food bad!? Updoots to the left!
Thanks kind stranger! Have an updoot! Happy updoot
that’s why i think we can all agree he should get to take a nice cut off of you
truth in advertising laws are a violation of my first amendment rights
can’t have shit in ohio 🤦♀️
at this rate they’re going to force every autistic person on the globe to go vegan
no more half measures walter
what is even the fucking point then
Thread needs a (CW: Food) and NSFW flag, btw.
My bad, I updated
