MTGZone
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world ·
edit-2
1 year ago

US Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private acts

www.reuters.com

external-link
message-square
51
fedilink
232
external-link

US Supreme Court rules Trump has immunity for official, not private acts

www.reuters.com

jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world ·
edit-2
1 year ago
message-square
51
fedilink
  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol. Have you been reading about this case at all and seen who is at the helm of this case? It’s Maga bullshit all the way down.

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes that’s Aileen canon the corrupt trump judge.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have not, can you fill us in?

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          First thing that came up, but pretty accurate: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/06/29/opinion/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-documents-case/

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I didn’t even have to open that to see that’s the documents case. This post was about immunity for trying to overturn the election. Different cases.

            • just_another_person@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, she (Cannon) literally mentioned she was waiting for a decision on this case as well since some of the evidence showed he had people stealing documents BEFORE he left office.

              The DC judge (Chutkan) related to this won’t fuck around due to this ruling, and is even somewhat empowered by it since it puts more power in her hands. I don’t think they can fast track it though, so that sucks.

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Really doesn’t change that you were going on about this case (overturning election case) being maga all the way down, while Cannon is on a different case (documents case).

                So how is this case (overturning the election) maga all the way down? I’ve not read up on it and if you can fill us in that’d be great.

                • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are multiple judges in multiple cases waiting for this decision. I’m not getting your point.

                  • someguy3@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    If you come in with claims about this case (overturning election case), then you better be prepared to back that up for this case (overturning election case).

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.2K users / day
  • 7.33K users / week
  • 12.6K users / month
  • 29.4K users / 6 months
  • 9 local subscribers
  • 24.5K subscribers
  • 22.9K Posts
  • 624K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org