Something conservatives learned a long time ago that progressives are just starting to wise up to…
The least populated states still get 2 senators and an over representation (at least by population) in the House. It’s easier to change the leadership if you can convince enough people move and the entire state has a sub 1 million citizen population. Your vote means more when there are less votes in the total pool.
That’s how Oregon happened
deleted by creator
Something conservatives learned a long time ago that progressives are just starting to wise up to…
The least populated states still get 2 senators and an over representation (at least by population) in the House. It’s easier to change the leadership if you can convince enough people move and the entire state has a sub 1 million citizen population. Your vote means more when there are less votes in the total pool.
Property is usually cheaper, too.
And Utah.
And the puritans on the east coast. New England?