Yet.

  • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sooooo, there’s a lot of truth to it.

    Once a site is big enough that they want to cash in on it, they develop tools and ai and make choices that are designed to keep you on the site longer.

    These tools and ai quickly discover that the way to keep you engaged is to keep you enraged. Content that angers you will keep your engagement longer and keep you coming back.

    This is well researched and I’ll cite sources if you need it.

    So what happens is that the ai, while it isn’t designed explicitly to show right wing content, will end up learning that showing that content accomplished it’s actual goal. It’s original goal being “Keep people on the site longer”

    Right wing content fits a nice niche where it engages a lot of people. Donald trump claiming that he lost the election will enraged the right because they believe in his horse shit and that the election was stolen, and the left gets enraged by it because it causes unnecessary violence like Jan 6th. The AI loves that because it’s fairly universally enraging, and engaging most people.

    • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      To build upon this, just getting into a petty online argument about nothing keeps users coming back. I enjoy reading the back and forth between two strangers

      • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand why you got downvoted. Openly discussing exactly how you’re going to trespass on government property and hog tie prominent politicians would raise a lot of eyebrows quickly. The multiple coordinated attacks, stashes of firearms and ammunition, the bombs that were placed, and the scheduled armed reinforcements that we now know about through the various court cases all happened in protected echo chambers and private chats, not on the open web

    • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no truth to it. The vast majority of negative interactions and aberations on a social media site is brought about by the users, not by the operators of the site. These tools they have are not as powerful as you think they are. The only reason they have any power at all is because the users give them that power because that is what they want. You don’t have a successful site by manipulating the user base to do what you want them to do, they will just leave. You simply give them what they want and they never leave. “The algorithm” is there to give the user what they want, and they’re actually really bad at doing that.

      • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The users create the content, the background ai decides which content to prioritize and promote to the front page, etc…

        Which part of that is wrong?

        • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fact that the user is the one imputing the data to determine the received content in some way. You’re selecting the content you interact with, not a black box trying to take over the population. They just want you to stay on the site, look at the ads, and never leave. They don’t care about your political allegiance or what movies you like, they will feed you whatever you want.

          • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Agreed!!!

            The user selects the content that they interact with, but because content that upsets you is so engaging, the AI will heartily promote it.

            look at how engaged you are with these comments! Is it because they make you upset?

            How interesting. ;-)

            • Strangle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I only really ever comment when I have something to say. This usually is only when I disagree with something.

              That’s why my upvote ratio is terrible. I rarely comment when I agree with something someone has said. I bet my ratio would be a lot better if I did.

              But that’s just human nature, I think. Some people crave acceptance and validation so they comment agreement and some people crave conflict and challenge, so they comment in disagreement.

              • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Everyone is the hero of their own story, so I think they feel the need to “correct” perceived injustices.

                I think your experience is common.

                And I think AI exploits this, because it’s useful.

            • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re attributing combative interaction to an algorithm on a site that has no algorithm. Congratulations you just proved the algorithm isnt needed to cause interaction. People do this with no computer forcing them to, but tons of people here are convinced that every other site is filled with bots manipulating content for people when the people are asking for the content, sometimes very directly.

              • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m attributing combative interactions to “keeping your attention”

                The ai just exploits this.

                So while it’s not NEEDED, it does happen and it works.

                Maybe your point is better worded as “the AI doesn’t overrule your own ability to choose”

                Which while true, doesn’t change my point. Combative interactions happen without ai, the ai just learns and promotes them.

          • antonim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you understand the system very well, yet completely ignore the ethically dubious aspects of the system.

            People are not born desiring harmful garbage. They are, at least in part, taught, conditioned to desire it.

            When you say that a site “feeds you whatever you want”, you’re ignoring the chicken-or-the-egg pattern of desire and satisfaction on the market. The site teaches you want you want. Internet addiction and the ways in which contemporary media and tech affect your mind (most obviously by reducing people’s attention spans) are fairly well known today.

            Imagine a drug dealer who sells his garbage to the same person so much that they develop an addiction. With your logic, we can just blame the junkie who keeps returning to the dealer, while the dealer is pretty much innocent - surely it’s not his responsibility if someone else develops an addiction and destroys their life!

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Purely anecdotal, but I have two Facebook profiles. I’m extremely left leaning, especially in the fake one, yet both have their feeds blowing up with articles from conservative pages and groups about this “small town” song, Donald Trump, and Ron DeSantis. Oh, and Fox News articles too, up until I hid them.

        I don’t engage with any of those communities or anything even tangentially related to them. I have discussed all of those concepts in groups lately, though.