• Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 小时前

    These math breakthroughs happened by throwing tens of thousands of agents at a problem to cover all possible angles (with tools developed by other mathematicians) costing the same amount of money as hiring ten top tier mathematicians for several years. Not saying it is not impressive, but not “AI can replace sciencetists” level impressive.

  • The_greatest_ahole9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 小时前

    Just because AI is smarter than Sam Altman doesn’t mean it’s smarter than top scientists. Especially considering Sam is just about as smart as a pile of horseshit.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 小时前

    Sam, just because the digital parrot outsmarts you, it does not need to be intelligent.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    I believe AI is smarter than Sam Altman.

    Sam Altman believes he is smarter than scientists.

    • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 天前

      But CEO’s are much more smarterer than scientists!
      If scientists are so smart, why don’t they have any money?
      Don’t tell me they value something other than “number go up” because I won’t understand you.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    208
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 天前

    Funny how AI has supposedly surpassed the greatest scientists, yet the greatest scientific discovery here is always announced by the guy selling subscriptions. If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.

    • kadotux@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 天前

      If he really believed what he said, he would. But he knows he’s just talking shit

  • mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 天前

    AI is not smarter than the best scientist. It’s just smarter than Sam Altman. But that’s partially because Sam Altman is regressing due to his over reliance on AI.

  • Leviathan@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 天前

    I don’t know, how is this any different than saying Wikipedia knows more than any human on earth? Ok, so you’re computer program has a bunch of information, who cares?

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    If it’s so smart, maybe they should ask it to come up with a viable business strategy, because he sure as hell hasn’t figured it out, lol.

    • isles@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 天前

      “We have no current plans to make revenue. We have no idea how we may one day generate revenue. We have made a soft promise to investors that once we’ve built this sort of generally intelligent system, basically we will ask it to figure out a way to generate an investment return for you.” - Sam Altman

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 天前

          They want to believe. They hope that, if they pump this enough, enough other people will chip in that they can make a return even if it crashes, but far more so, they want it to deliver. Imagine a super-intelligent money making machine, and you’re getting a big slice of the pie!

          They want to believe that they’ve found the free money hack, just like with Crypto.

          And just like Crypto, it’s mostly those that were rich already that’ll make bank selling shovels for the rest to dig their own graves with in search for gold.