Your assumptions you make on “human natur” is pure ideology. It’s not based on material understanding.
You just look at how dysfunctional the world is and try to spin a narrative that will confirm your beliefs. This is fundamentally no different than assuming if people in a certain region are poor and they speak a different dialect, that it’s the dialect that makes them poor.
Do you refuse to challenge your beliefs because you didn’t know or do you intentionally avoid challenging them, because it makes you uncomfortable? It’s much easier to become a nihilist who thinks majority of the people are just “naturally cruel” and give up.
Like what do you think communism even is? The “good guys” keeping “the masses” in check?
Your assumptions you make on “human natur” is pure ideology. It’s not based on material understanding.
You just look at how dysfunctional the world is and try to spin a narrative that will confirm your beliefs. This is fundamentally no different than assuming if people in a certain region are poor and they speak a different dialect, that it’s the dialect that makes them poor.
Do you refuse to challenge your beliefs because you didn’t know or do you intentionally avoid challenging them, because it makes you uncomfortable? It’s much easier to become a nihilist who thinks majority of the people are just “naturally cruel” and give up.
Like what do you think communism even is? The “good guys” keeping “the masses” in check?