SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 3 days agoBoth sides rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1605arrow-down133
arrow-up1572arrow-down1imageBoth sides rulelemmy.worldSoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-22 days ago Needs text alternative. Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative such as link: usability we can’t quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR text search is unavailable the system can’t reflow text to varied screen sizes vary presentation (size, contrast) vary modality (audio, braille) accessibility some users can’t read this due to lack of alt text users can’t adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments systems can’t read the text to them or send it to braille devices web connectivity we have to do failure-prone bullshit to find the original source we can’t explore wider context of the original message authenticity: we don’t know the image hasn’t been tampered searchability: the “text” isn’t indexable by search engine in a meaningful way fault tolerance: no text fallback if image breaks. Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images. Is this another “I don’t understand the spoiler effect & primaries” post?
Needs text alternative.
Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative such as link:
Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.
Is this another “I don’t understand the spoiler effect & primaries” post?