Blued and Finka were removed from Apple’s App Store.

LGBTQ+ rights and acceptance have taken another hit in China, with Apple removing two of the countries biggest LGBTQ+ dating apps. Wired reports that Blued and Finka are no longer available on the iOS App Store or certain Android App Stores following orders from the Cyberspace Administration of China, the country’s internet regulator and censor.

Apple told Wired that it must “follow the laws in the countries where we operate.” Both dating apps were available solely in China, where LGBTQ+ dating apps are minimal — Grindr, for instance, hasn’t been available on Apple since 2022. Blued exists internationally under the name HeeSay.

China has increasingly cracked down on LGBTQ+ individuals’ rights and groups in recent years, allegedly shuttering large organizations like the Beijing LGBT Center in 2023. For reasons unknown, Blued previously stopped new registrations this past July, with individuals buying second-hand accounts to use the app. However, it reopened in the middle of August.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      9 hours ago

      China is not a socialist utopia. The average Chinese person still has a better quality of life then the average American, because America is a capitalist hellhole.

      • zen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Both are shitholes mate. If gay people don’t have rights, no one does. Let’s not get into a dick measuring contest, because you’re both looking pretty inverted right now.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        live there then, im chinese i can tell you dont know want to live under ccp if you are not white and wealthy, promoting thier propaganda.

      • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yes, if you are part of the mostly culturally homogeneous majority, hold no views that the state has arbitrarily determined are verboten, are not in some way part of the many groups that have been arbitrarily determined to be verboten (such as increasingly LGBT individuals), are fine with a leader who is set to rule for life, are not below a certain age and unable to get a job in the ruthless job market, live in a city rather than a rural village with poor future prospects, are fine with widespread surveillance in said city far beyond most of the West (UK might give them a run for their money here), are male, and so on, I’m sure it’s a lovely place to live.

        Using America as the example is just funny. Did I say anything about America being good? America is an utterly dysfunctional state. Ironically, it seems both the Chinese govt and Trump’s admin agree that gay people shouldn’t exist. Pretty sad given that things had been trending in a positive direction for LGBT people maybe 15 years ago in China.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Dude, I agreed with you, it’s not a socialist utopia…

          And we seem to agree that America is utterly dysfunctional, and the average American is worse off than the average Chinese.

          I’m not sure why you felt the need to describe the average person, I wasn’t defending China… I already agreed it’s not a socialist utopia. It’s a capitalist hellhole with remnants of socialism/communism that keep the average person housed and fed.

          But in America today you can get arrested without due process and shipped to another country for being too brown, you can get thrown in jail for speaking against the genocide America is funding, and you don’t even get housing or food or healthcare to show for it, just work until you die so the rich can get richer and you can leave your kids with a mortgage.

          • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            46 minutes ago

            Given how many tankies are on Lemmy, it was really not obvious at all that you were agreeing with me as opposed to saying “ackshually it’s not a utopia, but it’s working on becoming one and America is shit for xyz reasons so you can’t throw stones at China.”

    • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well, in a socialist society, the purpose of romantic and sexual relationships is to bring into being the next generation of workers to build socialism, and relationships which don’t do this are bourgeois decadence.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 hours ago

        When they’re talking about owning the means of production, it’s manufacturing, not reproduction

        • monogram@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yet. Look around you at the fascist anti-gay capitalists in the growing western politics.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            36 minutes ago

            Point taken but I’d argue there’s a useful and significant difference between “capitalism”, “fascism”, “anti-LGBTQ+ rights”, and “(anti-)natalism”, despite overlaps.

      • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        In other words, force gay people to have straight marriages. I’m sure those will be functional and healthy relationships that aid the state. Not like that hasn’t resulted in numerous suicides.

        To put it simply, this is just ignoring reality and trying to stamp your own superficial views of society over it.