Western media has failed to accurately describe events at the heart of an Israeli military scandal, after the country’s top military lawyer was arrested for leaking footage of IDF soldiers allegedly gang-raping a Palestinian prisoner in a detention centre.

The attack was so brutal that the man was hospitalised with a ruptured bowel and intestines, severe anal and lung injuries and broken ribs. He needed multiple surgical operations for his injuries. The soldiers “inserted a sharp object into [his] anus and ripped his rectum apart”, according to Mondoweiss.

However, Western mainstream media outlets including Sky News, the BBC, Channel 4, The Guardian, The Financial Times, Bloomberg, The Times, The Telegraph and The Independent have failed to use the word ‘rape’ in their headlines when reporting on the story. The incident has been largely referred to as ‘abuse’.

  • madnificent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    Could we mark the description of these actions hidden, nsfw or at least add a warning? It is far too brutal.

      • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        True but the point is that the media aren’t calling it rape, so the discussion may not need to divulge all the brutality. A spoiler tag could be used and you can choose to read about it or choose to believe it’s rape without reading about it and then both go on to discuss the media and their cowardice.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 minutes ago

          That’s a fuckin weird take tbh.

          It’s news, if it weren’t informative it wouldn’t be news.

          “14 dead in house fire” clicks link “omg they’re talking about people dying in a fire! How could I have known this would happen?!”

      • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        They mean an NSFW tag (standard practice for social media) or CW (content warning) (standard practice for Lemmy).

        I wholeheartedly agree though, it shouldn’t be hidden. I’m also not opposed to warning people about triggering content on a social network where people who have such trauma tend to flock because their concerns are addressed better.

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          i’m not sure how “[CW: gang rape] Western Media Won’t Call IDF Gang Rape What It Is” would be more effective than just leaving off the content warning. The warning is right there in the title.