• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If he hasn’t crowd funded his legal expenses it’s because he’s actively choosing not to. He could be grifting this so hard.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Edit this comment and don’t call it a grift. Helping people fight fascist is not the same as biggots gifting after losing their job for attending Nazi rallies.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No, I mean he could raise way more than his defense will cost. He’s kind of one of the mythic figures of the resistance.

        When the early revolution is recorded to history, we’ll remember such luminaries as the Portland Frog, Polka Dot Lady, and Sandwich Guy.

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          He probably could. IDK what people would do with the extra in that case, but even if they kept it I wouldn’t call it a grift. A grift is basically synonymous with scam. It requires being deceptive of either the purpose of collecting money or in the goods/service being provided.

        • mriormro@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Raising funds for self defense isn’t a grift. Do you not know what that word means?