• melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Larry Ellison, the largest private funder of the Israel Defense Forces, is deeply tied to the Israeli national security state and counts Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu among his closest friends.

    https://just-international.org/articles/israels-biggest-us-donor-now-owns-cbs/

    Edit:

    The article also answers the question posed in this post about what does Oracle actually do:

    Oracle sees itself as an activist organization, one whose goal is the advancement of the Israeli colonization project

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      He also vets republican presidential candidates for Israel. That’s the country where his loyalties lie, not the US.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Much like Vampires, no sane person should ever invite Oracle into their home: Both are bloodsucking parasitical leeches, and you’ll never be rid of the affliction.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I cannot imagine any business leader crunching the numbers and concluding it’s better to stay with Oracle. I would order an all-hands-on-deck effort to rejigger the company database needs to get out from under these parasites.

    Only explanation I got it that they are unwilling to stall current projects and/or hire more backend devs while sorting it out. And yes, I am well aware it’s a monstrous task, even for a small company.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      A friend of mine was working on decommissioning Oracle at his company for the past year or two. The company bought some software that was using Oracle years ago. Turns out it was relying heavily on DB procedures and to ditch Oracle they had to move all this logic out of it first. They tried to do it couple of times before but failed. The software works so this work had low priority and would be scraped eventually to focus on more important things. On like a 3rd try they finally managed to do it and are now Oracle free.

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Sadly I’m in this boat. We use Oracle database and have stored procedures all over the place. For us, the cost to convert everything would probably be huge.

        I’d love to switch to PostgreSQL.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s cheaper in the long run, which is probably about 5 years, maybe less. Those fees are astronomical.

      In fact, I’d be willing to donate some time to help a small business transition to Postgres.

  • potatoguy@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Oracle makes the worst database system ever imagined by anyone ever. Can’t even insert multiple rows in the same statement, you have to put multiple insert statements and Oracle sues you for dreaming about any other database.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Techs like to deride sales and managers for incompetence. But Oracle is proof that salesmanship and suits can take garbage and make billions.

      I remember around 1990 when Oracle handled their tech problems by making it illegal to review their product. ( You had to purchase their product to use it or be sued. And the purchase agreement required that you not publish a review of the product without their approval or be sued.)

        • melfie@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That’s a great “it could be worse” read for any engineer who hates their job.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I would argue that selling a product that engineers need to create and maintain at great cost to the company (both monetary and in terms of frustration etc) and customer relations is in fact incompetence.

        or at least that’s how I see if from my own dealings with the sales guy at work. “okay yes I see you have an idea, but can we nail down a product definition, describe where we add value, and identify how it is different than these two other globally established products on the market right now?” nope, all he could do was be a little bitch about it. apparently he had customers lined up, though.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is one of the issues with the tech side of their business. They’ve been around a long time, and certain features that other databases had in the 90s were just put into Oracle a few years back. Devs don’t always have a good handle on the new capabilities, especially when the old code without the feature is done and working.

      • potatoguy@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Oracle sues for everything, when they sue you, they can ask for their payment to be related to the total employees of the company, to take that as users of the Oracle Database (trademark)(copyright)(shat my pants) or Java (do I need to repeat?). Yeah, they sue for EVERYTHING.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Oracle licenses software by CPU (or at least they did). But not in the way you think, they mean by discrete logical CPUs. So if you virtualize one of their apps and give the VM 4 CPUs, do you need four licenses? No, since it could run on any of the CPUs in the host, you need to buy however many that is.

          I went to look for more info on this and couldn’t find anything reliable, but I did find an article from Amazon saying that if you run something like this in AWS, you need enough licenses to cover the entire goddamn AWS zone.

          • Kairos@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Everything that Oracle makes really feels like they got the idea from a random engineer they stuck up on their lunch break.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Can I get an article/source about this? I’m in the mood to be mad about Oracle

  • Arancello@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    SAP does this too. I watched as a ‘license enforcement’ mob conjured up an ‘ indirect user ‘ concept to charge a top 10 ( in our country) client $10million for misusing SAP software for payroll and finance. The group was called Global Customer Assistance or some similar euphemism. It was all bogus. The client immediately started a program to rip out all SAP software. To my knowledge this is now complete. This customer abuse program was started when a number of senior execs moved from Oracle to SAP in the US.