Feel this is a good accompanying piece for all the folk insisting on caping for a Blackwater merc wth a nazi tattoo because he said something they liked.
Feel this is a good accompanying piece for all the folk insisting on caping for a Blackwater merc wth a nazi tattoo because he said something they liked.
Hopefully you aren’t a Maine voter because you’re falling for obvious misdirection and smear tactics. Anything to keep him from talking about healthcare for all or taxes on billionaires.
As an actual Maine voter, I’ll be happy to vote for him in the primary and hopefully the general.
I suggest you go watch when a reporter asked Bernie Sanders about the tattoo and do some reflection about where you get your media and what your priorities are.
Priorities (not ranked) 1. Policy position on unions and living wages, civil rights, all the basics 2. Pac and aipac money. 3. Anti Trump’s policies. 3. Integrity based on history of behaviors and current behavior. Especially including sexual misconduct.
Things not a priority.
Keep your priorities straight.
My priorities are not electing more Nazis.
Then you should have no problem with Platner as he’s not a Nazi.
He just… permanently scars his flesh like one!
Nazi’s use this tattoo, He uses this tattoo, Therefore he is a Nazi.
A plane is a thing that flies, A bird is a thing that flies, Therefore a bird is a plane.
I know it’s a meme to call OP an idiot, but you’re employing a fallacy that would get you laughed out of even a highschool classroom.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy
Got it. He just likes the aesthetics of the SS. Just like musk just likes to stretch his arm in a “roman salute”. And trump just liked the cheese plates that epstein had everywhere he went.
And… you using high schoolers as your example of great thinkers is just so on the nose that I can’t even think of a good joke. I mostly just feel bad for you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
Are you just scrolling fallacies on Wikipedia or did your network not get trained with more advanced arguments than simply making bad faith arguments tinged with sarcasm?