• masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But they don’t bomb, which I don’t understand.

    I’ve never once heard anyone talk about them, except to make a joke about James Cameron. Literally never even hear mention that they went to see a movie and it was Avatar. The fact that those movies make money confounds me.

    • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My (four) friends went and saw the 2nd one while tripping on acid lol. They don’t remember the movie. I saw it like last year on netflix or some other streaming service. I know of nobody else who has ever seen it.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’ve seen both. Happy to talk about them if you want. Way of Water had a lot of really cool moments but a lot of weird visual choices. They swapped between 24 and 48 fps (idk if it was 48 but it was definitely higher) seemingly at random. You’d think it would be something like 24 for dialogue and 48 for action, but it wasn’t that straight forward. Some scenes looked like they needed more time to look good. A boat crash in particular stands out. Other scenes were incredibly gorgeous. The young one (name escapes me) swimming to rescue her family stands out there.

      I think my biggest gripe about Way of Water was that they said they get this valuable thing from the whales. But the number was orders of magnitude less valuable than the material they were mining from the first one. It made it seem silly. They could’ve just given a bigger number and it would all make sense. Maybe it’s something about the initial investment to get to Pandora being the biggest cost so now they can pursue things that make less money.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I do watch and enjoy them, it’s just, the reason they’re enjoyable isn’t really the plot. In my view, they’re basically tech-demos for how much you can push cgi tech, with a relatively simple and chiche story to tie it together. They’re very pretty, and enjoyable for that reason, but once the movie is over there’s little to bring them up because they don’t inspire the same interest in the characters or plot or worldbuilding that a lot of other popular media franchises do.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        What I don’t get is why they can’t add a good story to that spectacle. Or even an ok one.

    • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mean, they’re good. Saw both, enjoyed both, will see the next one. There’s just not much to talk about though. The stories are pretty self contained, there’s no source material, so there’s not a lot to go off of. They’re also not trying to build/pander to fanbase, look at the amount of star wars merchandise and events out there. They’re just what I want out of a blockbuster movie, interesting, fun to watch, cool setting, have an anticapitalist moral, and you don’t need to have watched a ton of other movies or tv shows to make sense of it.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      34 minutes ago

      The first one was a big event and I remember everyone going to see it. Shit movie but lets not pretend it wasnt treated as a phenomenon at the time.