• Nobody@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jesus was a manual laborer who became homeless to travel and preach his message. He made a point to spend time with lepers and the dregs of society, tax collectors being the worse of them all, because they served the occupying army.

    His message was for everyone to love each other. It wasn’t open to interpretation. He made no exceptions. The less fortunate and oppressed were even more deserving of love and support from individuals and from the community.

    • Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The problem is that you actually read the Bible. These “Christians” never have. They interpret all right but read…nah.

      • cheers_queers@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        This isnt entirely true. In the fundie circles i grew up in, it was heavily encouraged to ready the bible cover to cover as many times as possible, on top of that required to memorize entire chapters. They know whats in there and they dont care. Thats even scarier imo.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Apparently they even have apps now that will pull out random quotes from their Bible to justify their attitudes.

    • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      You know how the Romans collected taxes in there less “Roman” providences? They have rich guys a contract to basically raise taxes and the rich guys payed up front what was owed for their division of it. Then they were allowed to collect taxes beyond what they paid the Romans to make a profit. This is mainly why they were hated so much. Many people might imagine some official going around and collecting taxes fairly, but the reality was they were operating much more like a Mafia extorting protection money out of people, and taking more then most people owed, often to peoples ruin or near ruin. You can also imagine how nepotic this becomes. People who have loyalty to the dominant ruling class would often catch a break, while those disfavored by the dominant faction would often be harassed.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s also the origin of some anti-semitic tropes. After Christianity rose to prominence in the Roman Empire, Christians considered lending money with interest to be a sin, so they were forbidden from working related jobs. This resulted in Jews, who were forbidden from owning land and many other professions, taking up the role of merchants, money lenders, and tax collectors. In the Christian view of the time, they were doing the “dirty work” because they were immoral and sinful, and the nature of the work made them easy scapegoats for many of society’s ills. The reputation has followed Jews into modernity.

          • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I’m honestly not sure how you’re helping defeat any stereotypes here because no one was even talking about Jews until you brought it up.

            • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              You know Christianity is an offshoot of Judaism, right? How early roman christians viewed and treated Jewish people is reasonable context to include in a conversation about the history.

              • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                Sure it is, in the same way that Satanism is an offshoot of Christianity, I guess.

                Perhaps that is not how it is practiced these days, but that IS how Christ intended it to be. Just read Matthew 23 in case you have any doubts. If that is not a scathing repudiation of any Rabbinic teaching that was around at the time, then IDK what is. If you can find a more eloquent way to say “shove all this crap up your own ass and die from it”, I can’t wait to hear it.

                Remember, they had the guy killed just for saying that.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It was open to interpretation from the very beginning. Exemplified in the fact that the four canonically approved gospels (we will ignore all the non-canon gospels) are contradicting each other in various ways.

      Fine if you choose the interpretation in your comment, but perhaps it would be even better not to let your life be ruled by what random persons made up in their fan fiction 2000 years ago?

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m sorry but in which one of the “canonical” Gospels does Jesus say fuck the poor and love yourself more than anyone else?

        • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I mean if you believe in God knowing everything and everything is happening because of his will, then that gives you the ability to rationalize everything, doesn’t it?

          Oh you have cancer? God gave it to you, if you didn’t deserve it he’d have cured it. Done, use that everywhere: poor, homeless, immigrant, race, sick, traffic, lightening, flood, airplane crash, school shooting, …

          That’s why blind faith is dangerous. And the idea of afterlife because they just do whatever now.

      • camr_on@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        None of the four gospels are in contradiction at all with what Nobody@anarchist.nexus said. Not sure what your point is