• Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The stay that the Supreme Court decided to give.

    Is there an end to that sentence or what?

    If it hadn’t gone before the court yeah, that didn’t happen it was immediately appealed.

    And if crocodiles were bananas they might grow on trees. It has nothing to do with reality but fuck it, I guess we’re just tossing out what ifs like they matter. They did not allow it, federal law might allow it, a lower court said it’s not allowed and the supreme court is saying we don’t know, we want to hear it until then continue what you were doing before. They’re just not preventing it because the fed says things would be irreparably harmed and the other movent did not provide a good enough argument for an injunction.

    You could say the federal government is allowing it and you’d be right.

    You could say a bad argument allowed it, you can’t say taking no action is the same as taking an action when it comes to judgements and rulings.

    You’re mad at a flawed legal system that overwhelmingly favors the state which is reasonable. In this case there actually doing it by the book and that’s what we actually want.

    You’re splitting hairs on wording.

    When speaking of legalities?! Gosh golly I wonder if linguistics and phraseology matter in the legal system.