• RindarSomething [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Thanks for the clarification. I guess that’s why everyone here just picks fights with each other.

      I don’t understand the need to play Devil’s advocate, still. Like why. It’s just sowing divisiveness.

      • WildWeezing420 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        We’re not playing devil’s advocate, we just have a materialist outlook on the world and don’t believe the world works like you do. Our priorities are different because we think different things are important. We are under no illusion that any “list” released would contain the full truth or result in any consequences for the ruling class. We understand how the world works, and it doesn’t result in magical consequences for the rulers without first a revolution.

        You are putting the cart before the horse. You want the consequences for the rich pedos before we have power. Screaming into the void won’t accomplish anything, we have to actually take the power first before doing anything

        In regards to the discussion of the politics of the Charlie Kirk shooter - the correct answer is to say “who fucking cares” not quibble over semantics endlessly trying to assess if we get points or lose points for him being on our “team”. He’s a lone individual actor, not connected to any movement, and his politics are irrational and pointless to discern. The Charlie Kirk shooting is the death of one asshole out of tens of thousands that die in the US every year from gun violence. The correct response to all this should be a giant fart noise, not making convoluted mental gymnastics why this guy is actually a groyper.