Five hours after Charlie Kirk was shot this week, an Atlanta man got a phone call from an Illinois police officer asking about a photo he shared with a couple of close friends on a private Discord chat. The Atlanta man, who asked not to be identified, says the post was merely a confirmation that he had purchased the same T-shirt that the accused killer wore (from an Illinois-based online shop).

Social media companies are generally forbidden by law from divulging users’ private communications to the government without a traditional legal process (e.g., court order). But there’s an exception: in perceived emergencies, social media platforms can proactively and “voluntarily” hand over private messages in response to what’s called an “emergency disclosure request” (EDR).

Discord, I am told, did not respond to any EDR here; but when I asked them directly if they’d provided law enforcement with information to traditional legal process, they declined to respond on-record.

The FBI, or the intelligence community, evidently is monitoring Discord private messaging, even from people who have broken no law.

Full blown Orwellian world. Run for local government and stop this shit.

The largest populated areas are left leaning. If they ae controlled by democratic socialist, we can restrict this shit. Just by pure numbers.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    so an illinois policeman called a guy in atlanta around a convo about a thing that happened in utah??? That policeman should be investigated.

  • baxster@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Socialist Democrates whant’s to destroy e2ee in sweden to both parties is anti encryption and pro mass surveillance. They are fighting against eachother of “who can introduce most surveillance and police state laws first”

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m fortunately not American.

    Guns should be regulated anyway.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They’ve tried. First it was white men only. Then women could get them. Now almost anyone can own them. Even people with extra melanin in their skin!

  • Kaliax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Snowden told us about these type of IC capabilities 12 years ago. We are cooked, y’all. Cooked.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    not a single person gives a shit about charlie kirk; the whole crackdown is because politicians got a glimpse ofhow people will react when they die and they don’t like it.

  • viewports@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I really do worry tools like whatever the naperville pd using here are going result in a lot of damage and upturned lives once their use becomes more casual, like god knows what’s going to happen with the president declaring random political views terrorism

    no real court orders were involved, the article mentions a EDR wasn’t invoked, no push back from discord over what sounds like some sort of dump or access to all images uploaded to the service

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Sad fact that we live in a world that his death accomplished more then his life. We all knew he was a Trump asset but I never thought it would be like this.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I saw this coming in 1999 when Scott McNealy inadvertantly spilled the beans on what his hateful industry was up to, and I have been extremely cautious about what I’ve been posting ever since. People have called me a paranoid crackpot for decades. I guess I hate to tell you I told you so…

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      24 hours ago

      De-google and open source has been my push this year. I’m not the most knowledgeable but I don’t trust these companies.

      I stopped using social media for almost 20 years. Only anonymous chats like this are used. Everything goes through a VPN and I always think that someone else is reading my stuff.

      9-11 put us on this track with no restrictions.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Using this to try to get more people off of discord.

    Also not privacy related, but fuck substack

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Ken Klippenstein has done amazing work and broke multiple stories.

      This is not a smear against discord but a reveal of how the government is operating. If you don’t think it is a privacy issue then you don’t know what privacy is. Being a fan boy doesn’t change what is happening.

      Use discord all you want but your point is baseless about the story.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Apologies, I wasn’t criticizing the article, or you for sharing it. It’s a tricky sentence, especially if English isn’t your first language - the “but” changes the subject. Article is definitely privacy related.

        What isn’t privacy related is my opinion about subtack. I don’t mean to derail, so will let anyone reading this look up why ss sucks and make their own decision.

        • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Gotcha. SS has a troubling history. One could argue journalist have a open door policy.

          How do you say one is a journalist while another isn’t? Today, anyone can be a journalist and a lot of traditional journalist are doing their own thing.

          Even credible outlets are changing. The New Your Times was considered top tier but now… lord have mercy. Billionaires are buying up and interfering with the companies. And then we have private equity firms, the lice found on the flies that eat shit.

          • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            Yes, I wonder what journalists (“professional” and otherwise) are supposed to do. Everyone going their own way and splintering off into many little voices doesn’t feel like the right answer, but publishers are beholden to investors and can be bought out by billionaires. I suppose there are publishers/agencies that have maintained their integrity like 404 Media, or Al Jazeera.

            Maybe this is just the burden of anyone in a democracy: to constantly weigh the quality of the sources of information you’re using to form opinions which spawn action.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 hours ago

    You may as well assume that anything done on public social media is being read, searched and filtered in real-time by law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

    Given the trajectory of this administration in persecuting people for their political affiliation, dumping commercial social media should be an imperative for everyone who isn’t goose stepping.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It was said in a Discord chat. Discord chats are not private, you agree to that in the TOS when you sign up.

        There are always people monitoring the chats, voice and video, looking for illegal activities. Something was said in that conversation that their algorithm flagged for human review and that person sent it to law enforcement.

        You have zero privacy on any social media. Everything that you write is viewable by the service owner and they actively look for things to report to law enforcement.

        Companies pay lip service to your privacy, but at the end of the day they’ll turn you in the instant it suits them. If you want privacy, you use encryption so that your privacy is guaranteed by mathematics.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That’s been the case for 10 years. Unless it’s e2ee, it’s public record and can be tied to your real name with a minimal amount of paperwork.

      Before I comment anything anywhere, I imagine it being read in a court room in a monotone voice. Bip bop dippity dop, the judge in this case is a swell person and I hope they have a lovely day!

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Sounds like a CSAM case for a motivated partisan prosecutor.

          People break the law, as it is written, way more than they think. Selective enforcement to target political rival groups is very much in the playbook here.

          It is less safe to speak in public today than it was 2 years ago, and it is only getting worse. Protecting your privacy also means protecting yourself from mob justice when they decide you’re the new target group.

          • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Protecting your privacy also means protecting yourself from mob justice when they decide you’re the new target group.

            New flavor of the month. Let’s see what Trump seen on Fox News.

    • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Discord is private social media, and most users think their messages aren’t shared with government without a warrant. Of course it’s possible in this case Discord didn’t even provide the messages “to police”, but that the police just subscribe to their commercial data-sharing and enjoy the same real-time access that way.