Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 天前not hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square328fedilinkarrow-up1372arrow-down111
arrow-up1361arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 天前message-square328fedilink
minus-squareKombatWombat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 小时前I would say this still works. Assuming we are not compressing it, you cannot fit more water into water. Therefore, water is saturated with itself. Therefore, it is soaked. Therefore, it is wet.
minus-squareSteve Dice@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 小时前Water can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.
I would say this still works.
Assuming we are not compressing it, you cannot fit more water into water. Therefore, water is saturated with itself. Therefore, it is soaked. Therefore, it is wet.
Water can’t absorb neither moisture nor water so it can’t be holding as much of either as can be absorbed.