Stamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agonot hard rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square290fedilinkarrow-up1334arrow-down110
arrow-up1324arrow-down1imagenot hard rulelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square290fedilink
minus-squareBeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·14 hours agoi think it’s possible to have too many buttholes. like, from a functional standpoint. it’s probably super uncomfortable.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 hours agoOr what if it just spreads the load, reducing strain on each butthole, making the experience better
minus-squarethespcicifcocean@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoBut I think there’s a maximum number of comfortable butt holes. 2 sounds good while 200 doesnt
minus-squareTypFaffke@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·14 hours agoDemanding butthole conformity is a classic argument of the right.
minus-squareBeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 hours agoi mean i guess you could read it that way. i should probably think of a better way to word that when i’m less tired
minus-squarekonju376@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoIt’s possible to have too many buttholes but that’s a subjective thing and doesn’t matter
i think it’s possible to have too many buttholes. like, from a functional standpoint. it’s probably super uncomfortable.
Or what if it just spreads the load, reducing strain on each butthole, making the experience better
But I think there’s a maximum number of comfortable butt holes. 2 sounds good while 200 doesnt
Demanding butthole conformity is a classic argument of the right.
i mean i guess you could read it that way. i should probably think of a better way to word that when i’m less tired
It’s possible to have too many buttholes but that’s a subjective thing and doesn’t matter