• SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      It’s not a bundle of sticks so I’m downvoting this just for the slur.

      Besides if Jesus was real he would not have anything to do with Kirk.

      • John Doe@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I posted it and I’m gay. It’s intended to be satirical. I’m not challenging your feelings. I’m just saying 🙂

        • papalonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You don’t understand. You are deeply offended and attacked. You’ll feel much better when your post gets removed.

      • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’m not entirely sure Jesus would entirely disassociate from Kirk. I kind of think Kirk is the kind of person Jesus would seek out to either preach to or make an example of. He was found with the sinners and the tax collectors and the whores and the undesirables, if my inaccurate knowledge of theology is anything.

        • presbypenguin@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Kirk wasn’t an undesirable; he was much closer to a Pharisees or rich man, or maybe a Roman given his connection to empire: an oppressor who manipulated and interpreted law to his own benefit and publicly condemned the undesirables and anyone who would dare say the undesirables are beloved children of God.

          If Jesus ate as his table, Jesus would say something against religious leadership or empire, which would add to the list of grievances they used to justify killing him.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If Jesus actually accepts douche bags like this at the gates of heaven … I’d rather go to hell

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I get what you’re going for, but by using a slur, you’re throwing the LGBT community under the bus with Charlie. There are so many more horrible, yet accurate things we can call him; you should pick one that doesn’t denigrate an unrelated group of people at the same time.

    • John Doe@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      From my perspective, it’s taking a slur people like Kirk embrace and throws it back at them by labeling their alleged all-consuming love of Jesus as homosexual. It’s a bit reductio ad absurdum - they label us sinners but they’re the ones with a hard-on for Christ. I’m gay and I created the meme, btw. But I also enjoy really extreme, offensive humor (I’m just saying. Not trying to be confrontational)

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I don’t understand what this is supposed to mean. I do know Mr. Kirk won’t be seen kindly by God, though. His misused his free will to become an agent of chaos and a proud troublemaker, after all. 🤷