Link to the polling data here

Other data of note:

Mamdani continues to go beastmode with young people, putting up regime numbers with a 73% vote share of the under 29 demographic, and a still commanding 62% of voters between the ages of 30 and 44

Amongst all candidates, a plurality of voters believe Mamdani has best addressed the Israel-Palestinian conflict

  • GoodGuyWithACat [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 days ago

    Seriously, who are the 9% voting for Adams? Are they all cops and relatives of cops? At least Cuomo voters are likely racist Democrats/centrists/divorced dads.

      • Riffraffintheroom [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think this is the real reason why this guy sparks an ember of optimism in me. Even if everything else good turns to shit and it probably will, if he wins it’s a blow against vibes-based politics across the board.

      • SnuggleButt [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 days ago

        The campaign advertised a very good set of proposed policy changes, even if they are mild compared to what’s needed to remedy the ideology killing the human race. Yes it was a good campaign, but it’s literally as simple as being decently charismatic and backing ideas that actually help alleviate conditions for working people. That’s how Obama won. The problem is it pretty much can’t happen at the presidential level and Dems aren’t charismatic relative to their base who probably want material change and not purely racism

        • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          he’s campaign obama. i hope he doesn’t turn into mayor obama.

          and i wish dem ghouls would at least pretend to support good things because that would let some true believers through and maybe we’d get a few million for pre-k or something

          • SnuggleButt [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well they do pretend. Not enough for us but damn it’s more than enough for your ordinary liberal voter

            You’ll get nothing and you’ll like it

  • glimmer_twin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    How long til we see the ratfucking that happened to sanders in 2020 when all the Obama called all the liberal ghoul candidates and got them to drop out/form a voltron with sleepy joe?

    If someone leans hard enough on 2 out of the 3 main opponents, according to this poll then the remaining one might just about scrape over the line.

    Of course not all the voters would jump over but who knows. Certainly would be closer than it is now lol

    • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s already too late for them to remove their names from the ballot, as the deadline has passed last week. So they will appear on the ballot regardless. Assuming the polls are right, and you really shouldn’t make that assumption, as Mamdani dramatically overperformed polling by >20% in many cases and 30% in a few other polls in the primary, their names appearing on the ballot alone in combination with their name recognition should be enough to stop them from overtaking Mamdani.

      The only way to remove their names from the ballot would be an extremely dramatic process that includes moving out of the state of New York to make their appearance on the ballot literally illegal and then all of them successfully fighting that in court individually and winning before ballots are printed, which will be quite soon.

  • CleverOleg [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The strongest position that can be taken against Mamdani IMO is for Adams and Silwa to drop out and they all + Trump endorse Cuomo. But even that seems highly likely to fail based on this data.

    • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Even then, it’ll never happen. Cuomo, Adams, and Sliwa are ALL egomaniacs and are too personally invested in running to drop out.

      On Sliwa:

      Sliwa said that the only office he’s ever interested in holding is mayor of NYC, and there’s nothing Trump could offer him to make him not run, and the only way he’d stop campaigning is if he was dead and buried. Tbh Sliwa is the candidate after Mamdani that I’d say clearly loves NYC.

      On Cuomo:

      Cuomo is Cuomo. He obviously won’t drop out and is too personally invested in this to revive his political career. He’s had a few minor endorsements and has far too much political and economic capital invested in his campaign to allow him to drop out, even if he wanted to. He has the tacit support of many establishment Dems, all invested in not seeing any ascendancy on the left, who can do basically anything but officially endorse him running against their party.

      On Adams:

      Adams is marred in corruption and unpopularity, but hates Cuomo way more than he hates Mamdani. He actually doesn’t really seem to strongly dislike Mamdani at all. I think his political calculus is that he could try to run again next election cycle and would rather it be against Mamdani, hoping he becomes an unpopular mayor, and that would open up the democratic lane, republican lane, and center lane for him to pursue, after also not having the threat of Cuomo to run against.

      On Trump’s failure:

      Trump’s best way to get what he wanted out of this would have genuinely been to endorse Mamdani as a poison pill. Thank god he and the people around him are too stupid to have done that. No guarantee it would’ve worked, but Trump already can’t run for reelection so the optics to his base don’t really matter, and it would really hurt Mamdani where his opponents needed it to: with the liberal/center-left Dems who just vote blue in NYC.

      On top of all that, it’s too late for candidates to have their names removed from the ballot. That’s pretty much the kiss of death for any anti-Mamdani coalition at this point.

        • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          Pretty sure non-consecutive terms don’t matter in the US. The 22nd amendment only refers to being elected no more than twice:

          No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

          That said he could probably just run for a third term anyway and the courts would say it was okay.

        • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          Nah. The 22nd amendment says “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice”.

          Now if I wanted to subvert this and had control of the electoral system, I’d simply stack the electoral college so no one gets a majority, upon which the decision devolves to the house, and such a president is “chosen”, not “elected”

    • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      If all those votes went 1 for 1 to Cuomo, but that is unlikely. At least a percentage of them have to hate Cuomo to much to ever vote for him, and Sliwa voters would probably rather stay home if there isn’t a republican in the race.

      Also, every bit of Trump tampering makes Zohran even more the anti-Trump candidate.

      Not to mention Zohran’s advantage in the ground game and his volunteer army.

      It is Zohran’s race to lose. I just hope he is still surrounding himself with socialists and normal folk and staying away from the Dem establishment as best he can.

      • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        and staying away from the Dem establishment as best he can.

        “Here are the names of some campaign volunteers who can really help you out, kid.”

        not-hillary

      • CleverOleg [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not to mention there is a HUGE percentage of the electorate who vote straight ticket and barely look at the names, if they do at all. Mamandi would only need a small percentage of those D voters to win.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      The establishment dems claim they have data showing Cuomo would win in this scenario. I expect them to try.

    • picklemeister [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      it’s easy to doomer and there’s plenty to be pessimistic about but it’s hard to overstate how crazy polling like this is just on its face if you can remember what it was like in the us back when history had ended, arguing with a baker’s dozen members and associates (two of whom were probably cops of slightly differing jurisdiction) of some ‘revolutionary’ book club on a thursday night in a laundromat basement

      • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        In a weird way I’m almost more encouraged by the 26% of polled voters saying having a socialist mayor is a neutral/neither good nor bad outcome. It shows the potential for people getting on board with socialist policies even they don’t actively identify with it.

        • picklemeister [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          yeah that’s a big part of it for me, the anti socialist response drilled into people from birth here creates a pavlovian response to the word and the way that’s losing some strength anywhere is just nice to see

  • blunder [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Honest question: odds he gets arrested, disappeared, or ratfucked? What are the lengths the establishment will realistically go to to stop this man? Will he be allowed to win? If he wins, will he be allowed to rule?

    • CoolerOpposide [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The problem with any of that for the establishment is that he’s just too tame and well liked. It would accomplish more for him and his movement than it would for them. It would honestly be quite hard to ratfuck him at this point. The best thing they can do is make him look horrible as mayor and try to kill the movement with unpopularity.

      Regardless of if the other candidates drop out and coalesce the field around Cuomo, it’s too late for them to remove their names from the ballot, which is essentially the kiss of death. They will need 100% of their combined vote share, and no amount of campaigning between now and Election Day will stop at least a few percent from going to them. The only way they can be removed from the ballot is if they literally move out of New York State and fight their own ballot presence in court as illegal, in which case it would be far more obvious what’s happening.

    • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Any of those would be too conspicuous in the run up to the election. The bourgeoisie can grease the palms of the city council members to get in his way, but the structure of the municipal government puts most of the power in the hands of the mayor.

      The most likely form of ratfuckery will be them lobbying the state lawmakers in Albany, particularly governor Hochul, to throw as many roadblocks up in the way of Mamdani’s agenda as possible. I could also see them “encouraging” the police unions “benevolent associations” to mutiny against Mamdani. That way they could spin it as the salt-of-the-earth the-pigs being upset with the champagne socialist while obscuring their role in it.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It all depends on Trump. Democrats and most Republicans are happy to just quietly sabotage socialists, but Trump and his particular Republican faction might actually do something drastic.

  • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Who did you vote for in the 2024 presidential election between Donald Trump and Kamala [COMMA-luh] Harris, or did you not vote?

    OMFG we had “Coma-la Harris” staring us in the face for years and we never saw it!?