Stickers with the slogan ““Russia is not my enemy” have appeared in Romania, France, and Italy.

[…]

“Russia has launched the propaganda campaign ‘Russia is not my enemy,’ which has reached Romania. Stickers with this message are appearing in cities as part of the Kremlin’s hybrid campaign aimed at creating the illusion of a ‘peaceful partnership.’ Through such tools of influence, Russia seeks to portray itself as a peacemaker, downplay its own crimes, and sow discord within European societies,” the statement by the Center for Countering Disinformation under Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council said.

[…]

The Center added that the purpose of the campaign is to undermine citizens’ trust in the rule of law and democratic institutions in their countries, cast doubt on the Euro-Atlantic course, and discredit support for Ukraine.

[…]

Russia has significantly intensified hybrid attacks on the EU’s critical infrastructure since the start of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

  • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    There will be no free democratic Russia without sweeping and painful changes.

    Unfortunately, I don’t think some people# understand this point. They keep comparing European culture to Russian FFS.

    They don’t get that the foundations of what is Russia is part Bulgaria (Cyrillic and Orthodox Church) and that its Slavic cultural foundations lie in Ukrainia (Kyevites) . And that the RF is run by Moskovites and Fascist Z people.

    They are not the same.

    And to our Canadians friends, imagine we start saying that Canada and America are alike in 2025. That’s how it’s for us, but maybe worse.

    #edit subject into: some people (was Americans and Canadians , but europeans too)

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Of course there will be no democratic Russia without changes. Putinism will have to be dismantled of course.

      But what you and the person you respond to are doing is ridiculous. You’re not talking politics, you’re talking “culture” as if that’s something immutable, monolithic and finalized.

      For fucks sakes, Russian history itself shows exactly that culture isn’t that!

      And I find completely ridiculous this weird pitting of Russian vs European cultures as something meaningful. Do I need to name drop a bunch of GIANTS of European culture that are Russian? Russian culture is a quintessentially European culture, Russia is a key component of European modernity, it’s not a foreign body, it never has been.

      But ultimately what I really want to push back is this apolitical Orientalist Huntingtonian bullshit that reduces everything to monolithic essentialist cultures. That’s just vulgar privincialist anti-politics.

      • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        No sorry dude, you’re not longer discussing this in good faith. To each his own, but stop trying to “culture” me.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I hear the intensity behind what you’re saying, and I don’t doubt the weight of the history you’re drawing on. But I reject the idea of eternal cultural essence: Russia is not doomed to repeat itself. My point is political, that regimes can and will change. Essentializing entire peoples closes off that possibility.

          • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            My point is political, that regimes can and will change. Essentializing entire peoples closes off that possibility.

            Alright. And I agree to that. Also I have acknowledged that possibility ( as in A Russian & Belarusian Spring). Heck, one of the most important universal laws is change.

            My argument was more that these changes won’t be easy and will require lots effort and time, especially because of the scars of autocratic regimes. That’s an important step to acknowledge.

            • acargitz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              My argument was more that these changes won’t be easy and will require lots effort and time, especially because of the scars of autocratic regimes. That’s an important step to acknowledge.

              No disagreement whatsoever.

              Common ground achieved :)