• 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The red part is the cum and the wee seeds are the sperms. Kewl.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      A peach contains a single seed but you don’t call the whole thing a seed. The pips of a strawberry are called “achenes” which is a type of dry fruit. It doesn’t matter at all for general use but it is botanically significant.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        An apple contains many seeds, but you don’t call each seed a fruit.

        I mean, I knew a strawberry wasn’t a berry, but your counterexample was completely irrelevant.

        Edit:
        When people downvote but nobody responds, I have no idea what people are downvoting about.
        Nothing I said was inaccurate, and it illustrated why their example was inapplicable, so what do downvotes mean here?

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          “Each containing a single seed inside” does not mean “those are the seeds” and I provided a counter-example to illustrate my point.

        • whaleross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          You are being downvoted because you argue your personal interpretation against a factual scientific classification.

          If the experts in the field have concluded that a tiny fruit that contains a tiny seed is still a fruit, then arguing against it is inaccurate.

          Unless you too are an expert in the field and have some substantial arguments otherwise that are more relevant that a gotcha.

        • quick_snail@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It means “I’m dumb. There’s a lot of dumb people in this comm. And mods aren’t doing their job”

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Strawberries are a type of berry. They go in a fruit salad, so they’re fruit. Deep in your heart, you know this. Do not believe everything you read on the Internet.

    • Photuris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s just about which taxonomy (i.e., context) one chooses to use.

      Botanically, tomatoes are fruits. But according to culinary taxonomy they’re vegetables (they don’t belong in a fruit salad).

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s often repeated, but I love the distinction between knowledge and wisdom based on this fact.

        Knowledge is to know tomato is a fruit; wisdom is to not put it in a fruit salad.

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I saw a variation on this once that added something else as “knowing how to make a tomato-using fruit salad taste good” or somesuch, but I forget what trait they assigned that to.

      • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Botanic science is correct (in this, at least FFS), whereas “culinary” taxonomy followed import law that was altered to dodge tariffs… They are not the same. 😅

        • Phineaz@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Botanic science is correct

          Oh you sweet, sweet summer child.

          To clarify: A lot of well established taxonomy was severly shaken when genetic sequencing was applied en masse, resulting in phylogenetic trees very different from what was thought to be nearly certain. In modern biology, you have different taxonomy systems for different purposes, each using somewhat different justifications (am not a biologist, but related). They are all “wrong” in a sense, hence the joke.

          • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Look, dear ol’ patronizing friendo. My experience is in culinary, not botanical science, and hence the snub at the tariff dodging history of tomatoes’ profit-focused designation as a vegetable (ie. staple vs. luxury), but thanks for playing. Syntax is a bitch, eh?

            • Phineaz@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Didn’t mean to patronise, sorry if it came across that way. I appreciated your joke, and wanted to add another joke about the biological side of things on top

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    19 hours ago

    That’s why my local Dairy Queen is starting to sell receptacle tissue milkshakes.

  • don@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Made up my mind, make a new start; Goin to California with an achene in my heart