• Bobo The Great@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    But if a civilization is peaceful, would it exterminate another just because they are a threat? It seems quite ruthlessy egoistic. Maybe they would just intervene at some specific point, without extermination but by somehow gatekeeping our expansion and letting us live without spreading evil.

    • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      As even a type 1 civilization it costs you almost nothing to send a big ball of death a few million years into the future to wipe out a possible future rival.

      The timescales are where things get tricky. If you wait for them to become a problem they will be a problem for millennia. and that problem will metastasize.

      Now if you have FTL figured out. I mean. Carl from accounting could wipe out all life on earth because he had a bad day.

    • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think of it the same way as the paradox of tolerance. If a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance.

      If a peaceful civilization allows the expansion of a non-peaceful society, it could spell the end of the peaceful civilization.